Frequently Asked Forum Questions | ||||
Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts | ||||
Re: er... | |
Posted By: Louis Wu <halo@bungie.org> | Date: 3/8/08 2:29 p.m. |
In Response To: Re: er... (PriorMarcus) : No, I don't Louis, that's why I chose not to dispute them, do you have any : example of a Forerunner design which actually looks anything like the one : in the concept art though? : I failed to spot the notice which said disliking things had become taboo on
Nobody's saying you can't dislike the art. You're in plenty of company disliking the art. You're totally welcome to your opinions. The problem I had was that you're choosing to argue about things that don't make a lot of sense to me. You say "I don't like this art [that's fine] because it's too symmetrical, which is different from all other forerunner art we've seen [that part seems silly to me]." So someone said "well, here are a bunch of examples of symmetrical forerrunner art from Bungie." And your response was to pick a couple of them and say "well, those are different because of X." By ignoring the REST of his examples, you're making me wonder if you HAVE an argument for them - and if you don't, why not just concede the point? "Okay, fine, Bungie made some symmetrical forerunner structures. But I still don't like Halo Wars stuff so far." That would be a sentence I couldn't argue with - that's your opinion. And by removing the weak part of your argument, you make the whole stance more solid; you can find a DIFFERENT reason why you don't like the art, but you don't really have to; there are TONS of things I don't like without really being able to explain exactly why. But to hold on to an argument that's already been shown to be false... THAT'S what I was wondering about, THAT'S why I asked you if you had any other explanations. The only opinions I try to stifle around here are those that hold that forum abuse is an acceptable pastime. :)
|
|
Replies: |
New Concept Art at halowars.com | Omega | 3/8/08 11:18 a.m. |
Way too symetrical. They screwed up. *NM* | gunluva | 3/8/08 11:44 a.m. |
Re: Way too symetrical. They screwed up. | jrod4549 | 3/8/08 12:31 p.m. |
Re: Way too symetrical. They screwed up. | gunluva | 3/8/08 1:06 p.m. |
Wroang. | InnerRayg | 3/8/08 1:49 p.m. |
Re: Wroang. | Peptuck | 3/8/08 4:26 p.m. |
I've got a feeling... | stan | 3/8/08 11:26 p.m. |
I hate to break it to you... | stan | 3/8/08 11:24 p.m. |
Re: Way too symetrical. They screwed up. | Peptuck | 3/8/08 4:22 p.m. |
Re: Way too symetrical. They screwed up. | elpolloguapo | 3/8/08 6:01 p.m. |
Re: Way too symetrical. They screwed up. | Psychophan7 | 3/8/08 7:22 p.m. |
Re: Way too symetrical. They screwed up. | Hawaiian Pig | 3/8/08 7:52 p.m. |
Found! Spark's real comment! | elpolloguapo | 3/8/08 9:11 p.m. |
Re: Way too symetrical. They screwed up. | Psychophan7 | 3/8/08 11:21 p.m. |
Re: Way too symetrical. They screwed up. | De Laal | 3/11/08 2:05 a.m. |
Re: Way too symetrical. They screwed up. | Simpsons Rule | 3/11/08 6:42 a.m. |
Re: Way too symetrical. They screwed up. | DHalo | 3/11/08 7:31 a.m. |
Re: Way too symetrical. They screwed up. | Simpsons Rule | 3/11/08 7:41 a.m. |
Re: Way too symetrical. They screwed up. | De Laal | 3/11/08 12:27 p.m. |
Re: Way too symetrical. They screwed up. | DHalo | 3/11/08 3:38 p.m. |
Re: Way too symetrical. They screwed up. | elpolloguapo | 3/11/08 3:45 p.m. |
Re: Way too symetrical. They screwed up. | DHalo | 3/11/08 4:43 p.m. |
AHH! PSYCHOPAN7 HAS BEEN POSSESSED By SCARAB! *NM* | elpolloguapo | 3/8/08 9:07 p.m. |
Excuse me. *PSYCHOPHAN7 *NM* | elpolloguapo | 3/8/08 9:07 p.m. |
I agree with gunluva. | S043 | 3/8/08 11:48 a.m. |
Explanation: | DHalo | 3/8/08 12:01 p.m. |
Re: New Concept Art at halowars.com | PriorMarcus | 3/8/08 12:05 p.m. |
Re: New Concept Art at halowars.com | DHalo | 3/8/08 12:06 p.m. |
Re: New Concept Art at halowars.com | PriorMarcus | 3/8/08 12:12 p.m. |
Re: New Concept Art at halowars.com | Gravemind | 3/8/08 12:39 p.m. |
Re: New Concept Art at halowars.com | PriorMarcus | 3/8/08 12:46 p.m. |
Re: New Concept Art at halowars.com | InnerRayg | 3/8/08 1:51 p.m. |
Re: New Concept Art at halowars.com | PriorMarcus | 3/8/08 2:04 p.m. |
Re: New Concept Art at halowars.com | DHalo | 3/8/08 2:12 p.m. |
^ignore that comment^ *NM* | DHalo | 3/8/08 3:04 p.m. |
Honestly... | UNSC Trafalgar | 3/9/08 8:52 p.m. |
Their fault. | gunluva | 3/8/08 12:18 p.m. |
With the exception of Sandtrap. *NM* | gunluva | 3/8/08 12:19 p.m. |
Re: With the exception of Sandtrap. | J23 | 3/8/08 2:13 p.m. |
Re: Their fault. | PriorMarcus | 3/8/08 12:22 p.m. |
Re: Their fault. | Aglor | 3/8/08 12:24 p.m. |
Re: Their fault. | PriorMarcus | 3/8/08 12:25 p.m. |
Re: Their fault. | Ross Mills | 3/8/08 12:27 p.m. |
Re: Their fault. | PriorMarcus | 3/8/08 12:29 p.m. |
Well... | Hawaiian Pig | 3/8/08 6:43 p.m. |
Re: Well... | ACEfanatic02 | 3/8/08 7:14 p.m. |
Re: Their fault. | Psychophan7 | 3/8/08 7:20 p.m. |
er... | Leviathan | 3/8/08 1:10 p.m. |
Re: er... | PriorMarcus | 3/8/08 1:23 p.m. |
Re: er... | Louis Wu | 3/8/08 1:38 p.m. |
Re: er... | InnerRayg | 3/8/08 1:56 p.m. |
Re: er... | PriorMarcus | 3/8/08 2:15 p.m. |
Re: er... | DHalo | 3/8/08 2:25 p.m. |
Re: er... | PriorMarcus | 3/8/08 2:30 p.m. |
Re: er... | DHalo | 3/8/08 2:36 p.m. |
Re: er... | PriorMarcus | 3/8/08 2:08 p.m. |
Re: er... | Louis Wu | 3/8/08 2:29 p.m. |
Re: er... | DHalo | 3/8/08 2:39 p.m. |
Re: er... | PriorMarcus | 3/8/08 2:41 p.m. |
Re: er... | Louis Wu | 3/8/08 2:47 p.m. |
Nice job, Omega.. | J23 | 3/8/08 3:09 p.m. |
Re: Nice job, Omega.. | Hawaiian Pig | 3/8/08 6:48 p.m. |
Re: Nice job, Omega.. | J23 | 3/8/08 7:17 p.m. |
ATLEAST.... | UNSC Trafalgar | 3/9/08 9:20 p.m. |
1UP Boards! | LoneRanger 2.5 | 3/9/08 9:22 p.m. |
Re: er... | DHalo | 3/8/08 2:55 p.m. |
Re: er... | Rosco-128 | 3/8/08 4:34 p.m. |
Re: er... | Leviathan | 3/8/08 2:04 p.m. |
Re: er... | PriorMarcus | 3/8/08 2:06 p.m. |
Re: er... | The Denxel | 3/8/08 2:24 p.m. |
Re: er... | LoneRanger 2.5 | 3/8/08 3:21 p.m. |
Re: er... | LoneRanger 2.5 | 3/8/08 3:59 p.m. |
Spartan, you might even say ;) *NM* | RefinedSolid | 3/8/08 4:13 p.m. |
Re: er... | Stephen L. (SoundEffect) | 3/8/08 11:12 p.m. |
ZOMG SYMMETRY | Peptuck | 3/8/08 4:07 p.m. |
Re: ZOMG SYMMETRY | J23 | 3/8/08 4:25 p.m. |
Re: ZOMG SYMMETRY | Peptuck | 3/8/08 4:29 p.m. |
Addendum: | Peptuck | 3/8/08 4:37 p.m. |
Re: Addendum: | J23 | 3/8/08 4:53 p.m. |
Re: Addendum: | Cthulhu117 | 3/8/08 5:02 p.m. |
Re: Addendum: | J23 | 3/8/08 5:36 p.m. |
Personally... | Peptuck | 3/8/08 4:50 p.m. |
I like it. | Hawaiian Pig | 3/8/08 6:09 p.m. |
Re: I like it. | Rosco-128 | 3/8/08 6:11 p.m. |
Re: I like it. | Omega | 3/8/08 6:32 p.m. |
Re: I like it. | stupidpower | 3/9/08 9:07 a.m. |
Agreed. *NM* | Spenser | 3/10/08 11:58 a.m. |
I like it | Psychophan7 | 3/8/08 6:12 p.m. |
Nice subject line *NM* | Hawaiian Pig | 3/8/08 6:14 p.m. |
New Concept Art fixed (none symmetricall) | NoneOfTheAbove | 3/8/08 9:08 p.m. |
whew... that's better ;-) *NM* | Rosco-128 | 3/8/08 9:37 p.m. |
RE: New Concept Art fixed (none symmetricall) | Kiloh Ekim | 3/8/08 10:44 p.m. |
Re: New Concept Art fixed (none symmetricall) | The Loot | 3/9/08 12:01 a.m. |
It does look off... | BlueNinja | 3/9/08 1:58 a.m. |
Too spiky. | SPARTAN-034 | 3/9/08 4:20 p.m. |
MORE New Halo Wars concept art | Omega | 3/11/08 11:01 p.m. |
I like this one. *NM* | gunluva | 3/11/08 11:20 p.m. |
Absolutely abhor the symmetry *NM* | Hawaiian Pig | 3/11/08 11:26 p.m. |
As do I *NM* | elpolloguapo | 3/12/08 6:31 a.m. |
uh | NartFOpc | 3/12/08 7:15 a.m. |
Re: As do I | Psychophan7 | 3/12/08 8:39 a.m. |
Re: MORE New Halo Wars concept art | Avateur | 3/11/08 11:30 p.m. |
Re: MORE New Halo Wars concept art | Psychophan7 | 3/12/08 12:12 a.m. |
Nydus Plasma Cannon *NM* | Hawaiian Pig | 3/12/08 1:18 p.m. |
Looks like a variation of the Library at its peak. *NM* | Leviathan | 3/12/08 12:28 a.m. |
I could see Bungie making that one. I like it. *NM* | serpx | 3/12/08 11:13 a.m. |
Is that a Blind Wolf? | Red_Breast | 3/12/08 12:43 p.m. |
The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33. |