Frequently Asked Forum Questions | ||||
Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts | ||||
Re: Bungie needs to cater to both sides. | |
Posted By: JakeDaGreat <jake@nefex.net> | Date: 8/29/05 6:51 p.m. |
In Response To: Re: Bungie needs to cater to both sides. (charthepirate) : The majority in your circle like it. Because 95 percent of all Halo play was
: The flaws/strengths in matchmaking are a different beast all together. No, they are the same problem. Matchmaking needs to cater to BOTH sides of the equation, not just one. Maybe standard settings were more popular, but from my experience on XBC and lans, AR/Pistol was default. And Halo PC was all pretty much AR/Pistol if I remember correctly. : The not so hardcores seem to have plenty of annoying B*ing about things like
Casual gamers don't complain about auto-aim or hitboxes, hardcore players do. The big problems that casual gamers complained about have been fixed. Standby, modding, smg start on coagulation, etc. It's the mainstream problems that affect bungie's "majority" that are fixed. : Back on to what you said though... : But if the hardcore players existed in the own micro enviroments, if they
: Just to sum up, if Halo 2 was LAN only, would there still be bitching. Yup.
Why would it be reduced? It's the same people and the same flawed game. The problems would still exist. If anything, the auto-aim type of complaints would be greater, because they wouldn't be complaining about a MLG playlist. : Do we still want internet play. Yup. : Char
|
|
Replies: |
The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33. |