![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
||||
| Frequently Asked Forum Questions | ||||
| Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts | ||||
| Re: Why retcons don't bother me anymore | |
| Posted By: Bry <bmulheran@gmail.com> | Date: 5/23/11 9:06 a.m. |
|
: Whether the author realized this or not, this becomes a calculation for the : Pelican's velocity. If the creators haven't noted this down and figured : out this velocity yet, they're in danger of directly establishing the : Pelican's top speed as being a certain number of km/h. : What if it's a lower number than what is calculable from those two data
Just for the record, when it comes to flying, those kind of figures are actually rather flexible as there are an incredible amount of variables. =) If you're going on a long haul flight, a tail wind could easily shave over 30 minutes off the time without dictating that the aircraft ever exceeded its maximum velocity, and it would also have used less fuel than one would typically calculate simply by going from published figures.
Even published maximum velocities are flexible.
Altitude is a further factor. Higher speeds can be attained at higher altitudes. The F-15, F-16, MiG-25, Tornado and Typhoon are all perfectly capable of exceeding Mach 2.
So something as simple as the altitude of a Pelican flight can significantly alter how long it would take for it to reach its destination, even if it was flying at 'maximum speed', as such a figure is never consistent through all stages of flight.
| |
|
| Replies: |
The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33. |