glyphstrip FAQ button
Halo.bungie.org
glyphstrip
Frequently Asked Forum Questions
 Search the HBO News Archives

Any All Exact 
Search the Halo Updates DBs

Halo Halo2 
Search Older Posts on This Forum:
Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts


Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa
Posted By: Hk_Symbiont <xenosymbiosis@yahoo.com>Date: 8/21/04 1:40 a.m.

In Response To: Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa (Aginor)

Before I add any praise to your superbly praise-worthy theory here, I'd like to get an inconsistency cleared off. I don't have my copy of the fall of reach at this very moment, but first strike states that it was currently august 30, 2552 at the time of Reaches plasma bombardment. Now, considering that I don't have FoR on me, I'm assuming the pillar of autumn left shortly after Fred’s rather garbled message:

"Be advised Pillar of autumn, groundside reactors are being taken. Orbital guns at risk. Nothing we can do. Too many. We'll have to use the nukes. Be advised, orbital MAC guns will most likely be neutralized. Pillar of Autumn, do you read? Acknowledge."

If so, then they departed for Halo on the 30th of August. You mentioned above that it took the PoA a 18 day trip to make it to Halo. That means they should have arrived on the 17th of September, no? Even so, in Halo: The Flood, it is indicated that it's September the 19th only just 20 minutes after the PoA's arrival at threshold.

What's the meaning of this?

Fellow Halo Junkie


Message Index



Replies:

The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summary aMetatron 8/19/04 2:34 p.m.
     Longest Post... EVER! *NM*WildMonkeys 8/19/04 2:39 p.m.
           Re: Very interesting must read^^^Mantis819 8/19/04 3:07 p.m.
                 Re: The theory is..Noctaurus 8/19/04 3:45 p.m.
                       Re: The theory is..Metatron 8/19/04 4:07 p.m.
                 Re: Very interesting must read^^^Assault on the Bathroom 8/19/04 3:45 p.m.
                       Re: Very interesting must read^^^Saint 8/19/04 3:47 p.m.
                             Re: Very interesting must read^^^Assault on the Bathroom 8/19/04 3:48 p.m.
                                   Excuse me.Saint 8/19/04 3:54 p.m.
                                         Re: Excuse me.Assault on the Bathroom 8/19/04 3:57 p.m.
                                               Look.Saint 8/19/04 4:01 p.m.
                                                     Re: Look.Assault on the Bathroom 8/19/04 4:05 p.m.
                                                           Re: Look.Saint 8/19/04 4:09 p.m.
                                                                 Re: Look.chaotic_mind 8/19/04 5:07 p.m.
                       Re: Very interesting must read^^^Metatron 8/19/04 4:05 p.m.
                       Re: Very interesting must read^^^Oldbean 8/19/04 4:35 p.m.
     Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (SummaAin Soph Aur 8/19/04 3:10 p.m.
           Very good theory , A MUST read *NM* *NM*Invictus 8/19/04 3:46 p.m.
           Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (SummaMetatron 8/19/04 4:03 p.m.
                 Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (SummaE.T. the Extremely Tired 8/22/04 11:10 a.m.
                       Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (SummaMetatron 8/22/04 10:14 p.m.
           Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summayakaman 8/19/04 5:54 p.m.
                 Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (SummaMetatron 8/19/04 6:27 p.m.
     Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (SummaMantis819 8/19/04 3:10 p.m.
     good theory, some holes, however. *NM*insaneidiot432 8/19/04 3:34 p.m.
     Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (SummaNeo-genesis 8/19/04 3:51 p.m.
     Explain what the holes in this are:) *NM*Metatron 8/19/04 4:17 p.m.
           Just when I thought "I" had it figured out.Dando7 8/19/04 4:58 p.m.
     Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summayakaman 8/19/04 5:47 p.m.
           Wonderful theory, worth a read *NM*Wiggum 8/19/04 6:23 p.m.
           Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (SummaJAGUAR2G 8/25/04 3:35 p.m.
     Awesome, but...Marcus 8/19/04 7:12 p.m.
     50 first dates - HSP Rocks!Wado SG 8/19/04 8:00 p.m.
           Re: 50 first dates - HSP Rocks!mnemesis 8/19/04 8:54 p.m.
                 Re: 50 first dates - HSP Rocks!Metatron 8/19/04 11:21 p.m.
                       Re: 50 first dates - HSP Rocks!mnemesis 8/19/04 11:42 p.m.
                             Re: 50 first dates - HSP Rocks!Metatron 8/20/04 12:44 a.m.
                                   Re: 50 first dates - HSP Rocks!Wado SG 8/20/04 12:58 a.m.
                             Re: 50 first dates - HSP Rocks!Metatron 8/20/04 12:56 a.m.
                                   Re: Riders in the Storm - HSP Rocks!Wado SG 8/20/04 1:10 a.m.
                                         Re: Riders in the Storm - HSP Rocks!Metatron 8/20/04 1:21 a.m.
                                               Re: Touched by an Angel - HSP Rocks!Wado SG 8/20/04 12:25 p.m.
                                                     Re: Touched by an Angel - HSP Rocks!Metatron 8/20/04 1:32 p.m.
                                                           Re: Touched by an Angel - HSP Rocks!Wado SG 8/20/04 5:08 p.m.
                                                     Re: Touched by an Angel - HSP Rocks!117-er 8/20/04 1:34 p.m.
                                                           Re: Touched by an Angel - HSP Rocks!Metatron 8/20/04 1:55 p.m.
                                                                 Your 'slip' is showingPsycoJoe 8/22/04 1:24 a.m.
                 Re: 50 first dates - HSP Rocks!Jagged 8/20/04 11:45 p.m.
     Well thought out and executed - Awesome stuff!Obakemono 8/19/04 8:11 p.m.
     small possible problem with your theoryTar 8/19/04 8:52 p.m.
           Re: small possible problem with your theorymnemesis 8/19/04 9:02 p.m.
                 However...Saint 8/19/04 9:55 p.m.
                       Re: However...Metatron 8/19/04 11:07 p.m.
                             Re: However...Saint 8/20/04 7:33 a.m.
                                   Re: However...Metatron 8/20/04 1:18 p.m.
                                         Re: However...Saint 8/20/04 11:10 p.m.
                                               Re: However...Metatron 8/21/04 12:00 a.m.
           Re: small possible problem with your theoryMetatron 8/19/04 11:04 p.m.
           Re: small possible problem with your theoryMetatron 8/19/04 11:12 p.m.
                 Re: small possible problem with your theoryxal 8/20/04 4:36 p.m.
                       Re: small possible problem with your theoryMetatron 8/20/04 5:12 p.m.
     Problem with spartan deaths......alstrong 8/20/04 8:20 a.m.
           Re: Problem with spartan deaths......Metatron 8/20/04 1:13 p.m.
                 Re: Problem with spartan deaths......alstrong 8/20/04 3:30 p.m.
                       Re: Problem with spartan deaths......Metatron 8/20/04 3:35 p.m.
                             Re: Problem with spartan deaths......alstrong 8/20/04 3:59 p.m.
                                   Re: Problem with spartan deaths......Energizer 8/20/04 4:31 p.m.
                                   Re: Problem with spartan deaths......Metatron 8/20/04 5:10 p.m.
     Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (SummaMichael M. 8/20/04 3:25 p.m.
     Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa *NM*King_Slug 8/20/04 4:19 p.m.
           Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (SummaKing_Slug 8/20/04 4:43 p.m.
                 Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (SummaMetatron 8/20/04 5:21 p.m.
                 Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (SummaMC vince 8/21/04 2:28 p.m.
                       Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (SummaE.T. the Extremely Tired 8/22/04 4:38 p.m.
                 Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (SummaViscily II 8/24/04 5:33 a.m.
                       Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (SummaViscily II 8/24/04 5:45 a.m.
     Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (SummaJagged 8/20/04 4:37 p.m.
           Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (SummaMetatron 8/20/04 5:24 p.m.
                 Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (SummaJagged 8/20/04 10:03 p.m.
                       Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (SummaMetatron 8/21/04 12:06 a.m.
                             Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (SummaJagged 8/21/04 2:57 p.m.
                                   Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (SummaMetatron 8/21/04 4:28 p.m.
     Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (SummaJamirus99 8/20/04 5:48 p.m.
     Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa117-er 8/20/04 6:27 p.m.
           Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (SummaMetatron 8/20/04 6:35 p.m.
                 Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa117-er 8/20/04 6:40 p.m.
           Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (SummaRedFox34 8/20/04 7:42 p.m.
                 Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa117-er 8/20/04 10:08 p.m.
     Re: A small detail, perhaps of interest.ajenteks 8/20/04 6:35 p.m.
           Re: A small detail, perhaps of interest.Jagged 8/20/04 11:11 p.m.
           Re: A small detail, perhaps of interest.Carver 9/3/04 9:23 p.m.
     OMG u released Halo Too's Stori!!11!!!one!1 *NM*r3c0nxiii 8/20/04 7:40 p.m.
     Awesome.Exogenesis 8/20/04 8:14 p.m.
     Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summatsuranuku 8/20/04 8:27 p.m.
     Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa343winks 8/20/04 8:44 p.m.
           Does this mean Keyes might return, :D? *NM*serpx 8/20/04 8:53 p.m.
                 Re: Does this mean Keyes might return, :D?343winks 8/20/04 9:41 p.m.
     Slight Problem....I think.....Sean-118 8/20/04 9:47 p.m.
           Re: Slight Problem....I think.....Metatron 8/20/04 9:57 p.m.
                 Re: Slight Problem....I think.....Sean-118 8/20/04 10:02 p.m.
     Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (SummaBroodwich 8/20/04 11:35 p.m.
           Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (SummaMetatron 8/20/04 11:59 p.m.
                 Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (SummaAginor 8/21/04 1:24 a.m.
                       Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (SummaHk_Symbiont 8/21/04 1:40 a.m.
                             Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (SummaMetatron 8/21/04 4:41 a.m.
                                   Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (SummaAginor 8/21/04 6:17 a.m.
                                         Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (SummaMetatron 8/21/04 4:49 p.m.
     Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (SummaHk_Symbiont 8/21/04 2:31 a.m.
           Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (SummaAginor 8/21/04 3:20 a.m.
                 Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (SummaAginor 8/21/04 3:23 a.m.
                       My...three bits?YamiyoNaito 8/21/04 4:13 a.m.
                             Ouch, sorry for the eyesore *NM* *NM*YamiyoNaito 8/21/04 4:16 a.m.
                             Re: My...three bits?Metatron 8/21/04 4:51 a.m.
                                   Re: My...three bits?Metatron 8/21/04 5:03 a.m.
                       Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (SummaMetatron 8/21/04 4:49 a.m.
           Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (SummaMetatron 8/21/04 4:45 a.m.
     Do you understand THIS concept?Metatron 8/21/04 4:33 a.m.
           interesting, but half-unintelligible.......theda 8/21/04 2:59 p.m.
                 Re: interesting, but half-unintelligible.......Metatron 8/21/04 4:07 p.m.
                       Re: interesting, but half-unintelligible.......Hk_Symbiont 8/21/04 5:16 p.m.
                             Re: interesting, but half-unintelligible.......Metatron 8/21/04 5:21 p.m.
                                   Re: interesting, but half-unintelligible.......Jagged 8/23/04 6:31 p.m.
                                         Re: interesting, but half-unintelligible.......Metatron 8/23/04 6:35 p.m.
                                               Re: interesting, but half-unintelligible.......Jagged 8/24/04 5:15 p.m.
                       Re: interesting, but half-unintelligible.......Louis Wu 8/21/04 6:27 p.m.
                             Re: interesting, but half-unintelligible.......Metatron 8/21/04 9:01 p.m.
           Re: Do you understand THIS concept?343winks 8/21/04 6:32 p.m.
                 Re: Do you understand THIS concept?DarkScorpio 8/22/04 2:11 a.m.
                       Re: Do you understand THIS concept?Metatron 8/22/04 2:32 a.m.
                       Re: Do you understand THIS concept?Metatron 8/22/04 2:46 a.m.
                             Like this?Nickk 8/22/04 7:36 a.m.
                                   Re: Like this?DarkScorpio 8/22/04 12:29 p.m.
                                         Re: Like this?DarkScorpio 8/22/04 1:35 p.m.
                                         Re: Like this?Nickk 8/23/04 2:56 a.m.
                       Re: Do you understand THIS concept?343winks 8/22/04 2:59 a.m.
                             Re: Do you understand THIS concept?Dando7 8/22/04 1:39 p.m.
                                   Re: Do you understand THIS concept?Energizer 8/22/04 4:40 p.m.
           Howz a Bowz Dis?Dando7 8/22/04 12:33 p.m.
     Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (SummaJoshua Pettigrew 8/22/04 9:27 p.m.
           Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (SummaDarkScorpio 8/22/04 10:05 p.m.
     Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa117-er 8/23/04 1:16 a.m.
           Coincidence, or Deja Vu?Metatron 8/23/04 4:59 p.m.
                 Re: Coincidence, or Deja Vu?117-er 8/25/04 6:17 p.m.
     Very Cool. but I disagree with the time loop partpile o' nades 8/25/04 10:19 a.m.
     two betrayalsgeorgeharthalo 8/25/04 2:19 p.m.
           Re: two betrayals, is it?vshields ash 8/25/04 3:42 p.m.
                 well u knowgeorgeharthalo 8/26/04 11:31 a.m.
     Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (SummaDavid Vacher 9/3/04 9:28 a.m.
           I am looking forward to...theda 9/3/04 10:23 a.m.
                 Re: I am looking forward to...Pak 9/3/04 10:40 a.m.
                       Re: I am looking forward to...MikeMan445 9/3/04 12:04 p.m.
                             Re: I am looking forward to...cam 9/3/04 11:58 p.m.
                                   Re: I am looking forward to...Metatron 9/4/04 12:15 a.m.
           Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (SummaMetatron 9/3/04 4:48 p.m.
                 Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (SummaGhentec 9/6/04 8:30 p.m.
     Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (SummaHavoc 9/14/04 12:28 a.m.
           Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summax1zero 9/14/04 1:28 a.m.



contact us

The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33.