Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts
|
|
|
||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
| Frequently Asked Forum Questions | |
|||
|
||||
|
|
|||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts | ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| Swarms = lame | |
| Posted By: Lisan <lisan@mac.com> | Date: 2/10/00 4:38 p.m. |
In Response To: Halo "Swarms" better than "Clans&qu (Bagman) What the heck is a swarm? As Mark points out, swarms was used as a verb... From what I recall from my brief career in the Army is this: A squad is typically around 10 or so ppl. Then the platoon, which could be 20-50 soldiers. Then the company, which could be made up of 1 to however-many platoons. After that there comes the Battalion, which is the next echelon. Then Brigade I think after that. Then Division. Anyway, for those of you who care, Halo will probably deal with only a platoon playing at any one time and that means several squads, made up of 5 to 10 marines, roaming the battlefield. What's wrong with the name platoon and squad? They certainly are better than "swarm." Lisan
| |
|
| Replies: |
| Halo "Swarms" better than "Clans&qu | Bagman | 2/10/00 1:41 p.m. |
| Re: Halo "Swarms" better than "Clan | Mark Levin | 2/10/00 2:01 p.m. |
| Re: Halo "Swarms" better than "Clan | Tim | 2/10/00 3:27 p.m. |
| Re: Halo "Swarms" better than "Clan | Howitzer | 2/10/00 3:46 p.m. |
| Re: Halo "Swarms" better than "Clan | Bachus | 2/10/00 4:47 p.m. |
| Re: Halo "Swarms" better than "Clan | Traxus | 2/11/00 8:18 a.m. |
| Re: Halo "Swarms" better than "Clan | Shataan | 2/11/00 9:12 a.m. |
| Re: Halo "Swarms" better than "Clan | gast | 2/11/00 11:31 p.m. |
| the Legacy of Mechwarrior...... | Sempiternity | 2/11/00 1:49 p.m. |
| Swarms = lame | Lisan | 2/10/00 4:38 p.m. |
The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33. |