Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts
|
|
|
||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
| Frequently Asked Forum Questions | |
|||
|
||||
|
|
|||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts | ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: Et tu, Wu? | |
| Posted By: DeAdLy_cOoKiE <deadly_cookie@msn.com> | Date: 3/31/03 6:18 a.m. |
In Response To: Re: Et tu, Wu? (Shishka) : No, no! We should look into this, because Deadly Cookie has always been a
=) Was that the best you could find? I've been known to post sillier ones. : With brainpower like that, how could I have made a mental block and ignore
Only fools would flame me in that post. Bungie was lame not putting in bots, or more likely, wise because they realised bots would be sucky because of the time restraint, but a "halo doesn't really need bots" excuse, is just that - an excuse. But it's forgiven (except for the "it's not possible to do internet mutliplay" excuse). I'm pretty sure the PC version of Halo will support bots. In the end I'm always right, and it's not that I ask for acknowlegment. Halo 2 will have bots, and some of my old suggestions implemented as well. Some of it is already in (look around corner, dodging, run, glare, reflective visor?, vehicle 'similar' like motorcycle etc etc etc). I AM a fountain of insight. I think I deserve an egg too.
| |
|
| Replies: |
| A mini FAQ for the MEGG added | Louis Wu | 3/30/03 2:37 p.m. |
| Re: A mini FAQ for the MEGG added | Ross Mills | 3/30/03 2:40 p.m. |
| I agree! | nightmaresc | 3/30/03 2:50 p.m. |
| Dammit, Wu! | Shishka | 3/30/03 2:41 p.m. |
| Re: Dammit, Wu! | Louis Wu | 3/30/03 2:44 p.m. |
| Re: Dammit, Wu! | Shishka | 3/30/03 2:48 p.m. |
| Re: Dammit, Wu! | Ross Mills | 3/30/03 2:51 p.m. |
| Re: Dammit, Wu! | Louis Wu | 3/30/03 2:52 p.m. |
| Additional quotations | Red Loser | 3/30/03 3:23 p.m. |
| Gah! | Gawyn [subnova] | 3/30/03 3:36 p.m. |
| No gah necessary | Red Loser | 3/30/03 5:35 p.m. |
| Re: No gah necessary | Gawyn [subnova] | 3/30/03 5:48 p.m. |
| Re: Additional quotations | Louis Wu | 3/30/03 3:37 p.m. |
| And then it got linked... | Louis Wu | 3/30/03 3:53 p.m. |
| Re: A mini FAQ for the MEGG added | Master of Halo | 3/30/03 3:04 p.m. |
| Sure | Gawyn [subnova] | 3/30/03 3:14 p.m. |
| Re: A mini FAQ for the MEGG added | Louis Wu | 3/30/03 3:18 p.m. |
| Re: A mini FAQ for the MEGG added | Count Zero | 3/30/03 3:20 p.m. |
| Re: A mini FAQ for the MEGG added *NM* | Master of Halo | 3/30/03 3:32 p.m. |
| sry, i hit post by accident *NM* | Master of Halo | 3/30/03 3:33 p.m. |
| Re: A mini FAQ for the MEGG added | Sam | 3/30/03 3:35 p.m. |
| Re: A mini FAQ for the MEGG added | Shishka | 3/30/03 4:00 p.m. |
| Re: A mini FAQ for the MEGG added | Eclarap | 3/30/03 3:33 p.m. |
| Re: A mini FAQ for the MEGG added | Louis Wu | 3/30/03 3:46 p.m. |
| Ok thanks *NM* | Eclarap | 3/30/03 4:00 p.m. |
| Et tu, Wu? | Gawyn [subnova] | 3/30/03 4:06 p.m. |
| Re: Et tu, Wu? | CyberBob [subnova] | 3/30/03 4:12 p.m. |
| Re: Et tu, Wu?.........ooo.....Caesar...... *NM* | hak campbell | 3/30/03 4:17 p.m. |
| Re: Et tu, Wu? | Louis Wu | 3/30/03 4:20 p.m. |
| Re: Et tu, Wu? | DeAdLy_cOoKiE | 3/30/03 5:01 p.m. |
| Re: Et tu, Wu? | Louis Wu | 3/30/03 5:03 p.m. |
| Re: Et tu, Wu? | DeAdLy_cOoKiE | 3/30/03 5:06 p.m. |
| Re: Et tu, Wu? | DeAdLy_cOoKiE | 3/30/03 7:52 p.m. |
| Re: Et tu, Wu? | Count Zero | 3/30/03 11:24 p.m. |
| Re: Et tu, Wu? | Shishka | 3/31/03 3:11 a.m. |
| Re: Et tu, Wu? | DeAdLy_cOoKiE | 3/31/03 6:18 a.m. |
| Re: Et tu, Wu? | Louis Wu | 3/31/03 7:42 a.m. |
| Re: Et tu, Wu? | Miguel Chavez | 3/31/03 8:15 a.m. |
| Re: Et tu, Wu? | DeAdLy_cOoKiE | 3/31/03 10:03 a.m. |
| Indeed... | Gawyn [subnova] | 3/31/03 10:21 a.m. |
| Cogita ante salis. | Pallor [subnova] | 3/31/03 10:35 a.m. |
| I Saw These and Thought Of You | Pallor [subnova] | 3/31/03 9:24 a.m. |
| Re: I Saw These and Thought Of You | DeAdLy_cOoKiE | 3/31/03 10:11 a.m. |
| And This... | Pallor [subnova] | 3/31/03 10:15 a.m. |
| Re: And This... | DeAdLy_cOoKiE | 3/31/03 10:32 a.m. |
| or why not: "Et tu, Lou-Wu?" *NM* | Andrew Nagy | 4/1/03 8:40 p.m. |
| Re: A mini FAQ for the MEGG added | Sep7imus | 3/31/03 10:45 a.m. |
| Re: A mini FAQ for the MEGG added | Ross Mills | 3/31/03 10:57 a.m. |
| Re: A mini FAQ for the MEGG added | Sep7imus | 3/31/03 11:00 a.m. |
| Re: A mini FAQ for the MEGG added | Felix | 3/31/03 11:09 a.m. |
| Re: A mini FAQ for the MEGG added | Free at Last | 3/31/03 11:23 a.m. |
| Re: A mini FAQ for the MEGG added | Sep7imus | 4/2/03 11:43 a.m. |
| Re: A mini FAQ for the MEGG added | c0ld vengeance | 3/30/03 3:51 p.m. |
| Re: A mini FAQ for the MEGG added | Louis Wu | 3/30/03 3:54 p.m. |
| As promised | Shishka | 3/30/03 3:51 p.m. |
| Wonga.Nice job *NM* | Master of Halo | 3/30/03 3:57 p.m. |
| Can we figure out what levels Jaime worked on? | Wado SG | 3/30/03 7:38 p.m. |
| Re: Can we figure out what levels Jaime worked on? | Louis Wu | 3/30/03 8:12 p.m. |
| Re: Can we figure out what levels Jaime worked on? | Barkbat | 3/31/03 1:19 p.m. |
| Re: Can we figure out what levels Jaime worked on? | Felix | 3/31/03 1:37 p.m. |
| Re: Can we figure out what levels Jaime worked on? | Murmandamus | 4/1/03 9:15 p.m. |
The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33. |