Frequently Asked Forum Questions
Search the HBO News Archives Any All Exact		Search the Halo Updates DBs Halo Halo2		Bungie Webcam HBO XBL Gamertags *Ar's Simple HTML Guide Shishka's Guide for Newcomers The Lowdown on Download Accelerators Red Loser's Anti-Spamming Guide Egg FAQ | More Egg Stuff c0ld's Movie Starter Guide Shishka's HaloPC Pre-Release FAQ 3.1 AutoMagic 117 StripzMaker
Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts

Re: Wasn't the article meant to be a joke?
Posted By: Lurono	Date: 9/9/11 8:38 p.m.
In Response To: Re: Wasn't the article meant to be a joke? (Revenant1988) : Yeah I'm pretty sure that its not a "joke" article. : Most of us are judge mental because for most news-following halo fans, this : info is not new, at all. Some of it is common sense. A lot of game news : has been pretty stupid lately, just because it is either lazy or just : sensationalism to try to attract readers. : Articles like this one make most of go: Really? This is news? This thing that : has been covered like 5 times already? Really?????? Well, if every one of the Q and A sessions during the Halo Fest panels (and half of the questions I've seen on the Internet ever) are any indication, they can say something as many times as they like in as many places as they like and SOMEONE will still miss it somehow. Articles like this (and I agree that it wasn't very good) do serve the purpose of real quickly getting information out there. How many times have you seen people on this forum ask questions like "Will the sounds in H:CEA switch over with the graphics" or "Will H:CEA be a two disc set like ODST"? I've seen those questions (and many others, those were just the best/more recent examples) asked numerous times over the last few months even though those answers have been covered in numerous places already (Waypoint, gaming news sites, magazines, etc.). /Even if it's not news to you it could easily be news to someone else.

Message Index

OXM-20 things Halo anniversary changes	ElzarTheBam	9/9/11 6:50 a.m.
Re: OXM-20 things Halo anniversary changes	Urban Reflex	9/9/11 6:55 a.m.
Re: OXM-20 things Halo anniversary changes	Myyke	9/9/11 7:08 a.m.
HBO:Lock up your General Vaguenesses! *NM*	ElzarTheBam	9/9/11 7:14 a.m.
Re: OXM-20 things Halo anniversary changes	General Vagueness	9/9/11 3:08 p.m.
Re: OXM-20 things Halo anniversary changes	DEEP NNN	9/9/11 7:14 a.m.
Re: OXM-20 things Halo anniversary changes	Myyke	9/9/11 7:16 a.m.
Re: OXM-20 things Halo anniversary changes	Der Flatulator6	9/9/11 7:27 a.m.
Re: OXM-20 things Halo anniversary changes	DEEP NNN	9/9/11 7:25 a.m.
Re: OXM-20 things Halo anniversary changes	Rt. Hon. Wolzee	9/9/11 7:35 a.m.
Yep, pick and mix shop all closed up : ( *NM*	ElzarTheBam	9/9/11 7:41 a.m.
Re: dammit	Beckx	9/9/11 7:40 a.m.
Re: dammit	Bry	9/9/11 7:41 a.m.
Re: dammit	Der Flatulator6	9/9/11 7:48 a.m.
Some of those differences are pretty deep	FoolsRun	9/9/11 8:06 a.m.
Re: OXM-20 things Halo anniversary changes	Kermit	9/9/11 8:31 a.m.
Most of that list was painfully stupid...	bluerunner	9/9/11 8:57 a.m.
Re: Most of that list was painfully stupid...	Avateur	9/9/11 10:30 a.m.
Re: Most of that list was painfully stupid...	bluerunner	9/9/11 10:41 a.m.
Your JOKING	nomis78	9/9/11 9:01 a.m.
Re: Your JOKING	Beckx	9/9/11 9:07 a.m.
Re: Your JOKING	Miguel Chavez	9/9/11 12:51 p.m.
Re: Your JOKING	General Vagueness	9/9/11 3:11 p.m.
OXM- 20 Derps in herp-lo *NM*	Revenant1988	9/9/11 9:03 a.m.
Wasn't the article meant to be a joke?	SF GRIMMIRE	9/9/11 3:36 p.m.
Re: Wasn't the article meant to be a joke?	Revenant1988	9/9/11 5:04 p.m.
Re: Wasn't the article meant to be a joke?	Lurono	9/9/11 8:38 p.m.
Re: Wasn't the article meant to be a joke?	Revenant1988	9/9/11 10:17 p.m.
Re: Wasn't the article meant to be a joke?	SF GRIMMIRE	9/10/11 6:30 a.m.
Can't argue with that *NM*	Lurono	9/10/11 2:24 p.m.