Frequently Asked Forum Questions
Search the HBO News Archives Any All Exact		Search the Halo Updates DBs Halo Halo2		Bungie Webcam HBO XBL Gamertags *Ar's Simple HTML Guide Shishka's Guide for Newcomers The Lowdown on Download Accelerators Red Loser's Anti-Spamming Guide Egg FAQ | More Egg Stuff c0ld's Movie Starter Guide Shishka's HaloPC Pre-Release FAQ 3.1 AutoMagic 117 StripzMaker
Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts

Re: New Reach Trailer
Posted By: GrimBrother IV <GrimBrothersTM@gmail.com>	Date: 8/27/10 11:46 a.m.
In Response To: Re: New Reach Trailer (Anton P. Nym (aka Steve)) : All that would do is hasten the deaths of a few Grunts by a few moments... : dead by bullet or dead by atomic vaporisation makes no difference in the : outcome. : -- Steve thinks it's better by far to try to "preserve the asset" : if possible so that you can shoot at Grunts who won't be inside the : unstoppable fireball. I totally see where everybody is coming from and I totally agree about "preserving the asset" and all that, I'm all for living to fight another day. however, I said what I did because I thought it was the most Spartan outcome. for, as previously stated, when the bomb is thrown the timer is at :01. Spartans are realistic and good enough at math to know that he cannot escape to a safe distance in that amount of time. I would think a Spartan thought process, with that knowledge in mind, would be first to stay, whether fighting or not, not only to be valiant, but in the event of some sort of malfunction of the nuke. make sense?

Message Index

New Reach Trailer!	GrimBrother One	8/26/10 8:14 a.m.
Youtube version OMG	ElzarTheBam	8/26/10 8:15 a.m.
F*ck'in A!	SPARTAN-034	8/26/10 10:10 a.m.
Re: Youtube version OMG	T07WRX5	8/26/10 11:19 a.m.
Re: Youtube version OMG	Archilen	8/26/10 11:41 a.m.
Awesome! *NM*	Jim 028	8/26/10 8:18 a.m.
^^Ditto *NM*	ChenK	8/26/10 8:31 a.m.
I'm hoping...	GrimBrother One	8/26/10 8:18 a.m.
well.....	ManKitten	8/26/10 8:20 a.m.
Re: well.....	Lobster	8/26/10 8:23 a.m.
Re: well.....	Lobster	8/26/10 8:27 a.m.
Re: well.....	GrimBrother One	8/26/10 8:29 a.m.
Re: well.....	Lobster	8/26/10 8:35 a.m.
I think you nailed it.	ManKitten	8/26/10 8:37 a.m.
Re: I think you nailed it.	Lobster	8/26/10 8:41 a.m.
Tactical nuclear weapons can be small	Jim 028	8/26/10 8:46 a.m.
Re: Tactical nuclear weapons can be small	PooBone	8/26/10 8:50 a.m.
Re: Tactical nuclear weapons can be small	GrimBrother One	8/26/10 8:51 a.m.
Re: Tactical nuclear weapons can be small	Archilen	8/26/10 8:54 a.m.
Re: Tactical nuclear weapons can be small	telemachus	8/26/10 8:55 a.m.
Re: Tactical nuclear weapons can be small	telemachus	8/26/10 8:56 a.m.
Maths. May be wrong, I work in Arts and Humanities	Jim 028	8/26/10 9:05 a.m.
^^probably wrong looking at other peoples answers. *NM*	Jim 028	8/26/10 9:18 a.m.
here's my source	telemachus	8/26/10 9:20 a.m.
Looks better than my maths ;) *NM*	Jim 028	8/26/10 9:25 a.m.
^I got 13.7 megaton *NM*	Lobster	8/26/10 9:25 a.m.
Re: here's my source	Hedgemony	8/26/10 9:29 a.m.
Re: here's my source	Archilen	8/26/10 9:38 a.m.
Re: here's my source	Slith	8/28/10 12:04 a.m.
Hiroshima..	Lobster	8/26/10 9:30 a.m.
Re: Hiroshima..	Hedgemony	8/26/10 9:49 a.m.
Re: Hiroshima..	jlm699	8/26/10 10:15 a.m.
Re: Hiroshima..	Bry	8/26/10 10:38 a.m.
Re: Hiroshima..	Jim 028	8/26/10 10:45 a.m.
Re: Hiroshima..	SPARTAN-034	8/26/10 3:16 p.m.
Re: Hiroshima..	kanbo	8/26/10 4:02 p.m.
That's the guy N6 replaces	ShortroundMcfly	8/26/10 6:00 p.m.
63 TJ output = 15.057 Megatons *Math inside*	[AMS] GreyThor	8/26/10 11:31 a.m.
Re: 63 TJ output = 15.057 Megatons *Math inside*	Archilen	8/26/10 11:39 a.m.
Re: 63 TJ output = 15.057 Megatons *Math inside*	telemachus	8/26/10 11:45 a.m.
Re: 63 TJ output = 15.057 Megatons *Math inside*	[AMS] GreyThor	8/26/10 11:47 a.m.
You're off by an order of magnitude	Slith	8/28/10 12:08 a.m.
Re: Tactical nuclear weapons can be small	El Presidente81	8/26/10 9:51 a.m.
Re: Tactical nuclear weapons can be small	Bry	8/26/10 10:43 a.m.
Re: Tactical nuclear weapons can be small	SonofMacPhisto	8/26/10 7:51 p.m.
Re: Tactical nuclear weapons can be small	dogcom	8/26/10 8:01 p.m.
Hello....500 years in the future	CYBRFRK	8/26/10 10:56 a.m.
Re: I think you nailed it. *alittlebookspoilage*	GrimBrother IV	8/26/10 8:51 a.m.
Deliver Hope	dogcom	8/26/10 8:52 a.m.
wont load	ManKitten	8/26/10 8:57 a.m.
Re: I think you nailed it. *alittlebookspoilage*	telemachus	8/26/10 8:53 a.m.
Re: I think you nailed it. *alittlebookspoilage*	Archilen	8/26/10 8:59 a.m.
Re: I think you nailed it. *alittlebookspoilage*	Jim 028	8/26/10 9:08 a.m.
Re: I think you nailed it. *alittlebookspoilage*	Lobster	8/26/10 9:12 a.m.
I thought it was Carter	Mid7night	8/26/10 9:32 a.m.
Re: I thought it was Carter	GrimBrother One	8/26/10 9:35 a.m.
I see it	Mid7night	8/26/10 9:39 a.m.
NP :-) *NM*	GrimBrother One	8/26/10 10:01 a.m.
Re: I think you nailed it.	telemachus	8/26/10 8:51 a.m.
Re: I think you nailed it.	Archilen	8/26/10 8:56 a.m.
high-five for simul-post! *NM*	GrimBrother IV	8/26/10 8:57 a.m.
100% agree	SPU7N1K	8/26/10 10:13 a.m.
Well, they broke their "No Noble 6" streak *NM*	pete_the_duck	8/26/10 8:23 a.m.
I really liked it.	serpx	8/26/10 8:30 a.m.
I liked it... BUT....	PooBone	8/26/10 8:35 a.m.
Re: I liked it... BUT....	Lobster	8/26/10 8:36 a.m.
Re: I liked it... BUT....	PooBone	8/26/10 8:44 a.m.
You don't see any of them die...	Mid7night	8/26/10 9:48 a.m.
Not what it appears to be...	Mid7night	8/26/10 9:52 a.m.
Re: Not what it appears to be...	T07WRX5	8/26/10 11:09 a.m.
Re: Not what it appears to be...	imode	8/26/10 3:02 p.m.
Re: Not what it appears to be...	General Vagueness	8/26/10 5:22 p.m.
Re: I liked it... BUT....	ManKitten	8/26/10 8:39 a.m.
Re: I liked it... BUT.... *SPOILERS*	PooBone	8/26/10 8:46 a.m.
Re: I liked it... BUT....	Louis Wu	8/26/10 9:37 a.m.
Re: I liked it... BUT....	Louis Wu	8/26/10 9:39 a.m.
Re: I liked it... BUT....	GrimBrother IV	8/26/10 9:42 a.m.
Re: I liked it... BUT....	PooBone	8/26/10 9:48 a.m.
Re: I liked it... BUT....	Archilen	8/26/10 10:19 a.m.
Re: I liked it... BUT....	PooBone	8/26/10 10:35 a.m.
Re: I liked it... BUT....	DHalo	8/26/10 11:56 a.m.
Re: I liked it... BUT....	Archilen	8/26/10 9:42 a.m.
Re: I liked it... BUT....	ShortroundMcfly	8/26/10 6:04 p.m.
I wonder if there will be an extended one? *NM*	ElzarTheBam	8/26/10 8:31 a.m.
Re: New Reach Trailer!	CaneCutter	8/26/10 8:41 a.m.
Re: New Reach Trailer!	Lobster	8/26/10 8:42 a.m.
Couple of things I noticed...	GrimBrother One	8/26/10 8:49 a.m.
Re: Couple of things I noticed...	VAVA Mk2	8/26/10 9:09 a.m.
Re: It's Thom?	hotshot revan	8/26/10 9:33 a.m.
Re: New Reach Trailer!	Hedgemony	8/26/10 9:07 a.m.
Re: New Reach Trailer!	CaneCutter	8/26/10 9:20 a.m.
Re: New Reach Trailer!	bluerunner	8/26/10 9:30 a.m.
Re: New Reach Trailer!	GrimBrother IV	8/26/10 8:46 a.m.
Re: New Reach Trailer!	Archilen	8/26/10 8:54 a.m.
I am rethinking initial campaign armor choice thou	GrimBrother One	8/26/10 9:00 a.m.
Re: I am rethinking initial campaign armor choice	Rosco-128	8/26/10 9:02 a.m.
Rosco, slightly off topic...	GrimBrother One	8/26/10 9:05 a.m.
Re: Rosco, slightly off topic...	Rosco-128	8/26/10 9:14 a.m.
Lol, just wondering with the name.	GrimBrother One	8/26/10 9:22 a.m.
Re: Lol, just wondering with the name.	Rosco-128	8/26/10 9:25 a.m.
Re: Lol, just wondering with the name.	bluerunner	8/26/10 9:31 a.m.
Re: I am rethinking initial campaign armor choice	Lobster	8/26/10 9:04 a.m.
Re: I am rethinking initial campaign armor choice	GrimBrother One	8/26/10 9:08 a.m.
Re: I am rethinking initial campaign armor choice	GrimBrother IV	8/26/10 9:07 a.m.
Re: I am rethinking initial campaign armor choice	Jim 028	8/26/10 9:12 a.m.
Re: I am rethinking initial campaign armor choice	Lobster	8/26/10 9:14 a.m.
Re: I am rethinking initial campaign armor choice	GrimBrother One	8/26/10 9:15 a.m.
Re: I am rethinking initial campaign armor choice	Jim 028	8/26/10 9:18 a.m.
No prosthetic arm??	Stormwing	8/26/10 9:08 a.m.
Re: No prosthetic arm??	Archilen	8/26/10 9:12 a.m.
Re: No prosthetic arm??	telemachus	8/26/10 9:15 a.m.
Re: No prosthetic arm??	GrimBrother IV	8/26/10 9:14 a.m.
Re: No prosthetic arm??	Lobster	8/26/10 9:18 a.m.
Re: No prosthetic arm??	Gtag=Reluctant Chaos	8/26/10 9:27 a.m.
Got my ass a theory	Time Glitch	8/26/10 9:26 a.m.
Re: Got my ass a theory	GrimBrother IV	8/26/10 9:31 a.m.
Re: Got my ass a theory	Archilen	8/26/10 9:40 a.m.
Re: Got my ass a theory	SonofMacPhisto	8/26/10 8:02 p.m.
AN ANSWER *SP*	Stormwing	8/26/10 9:34 a.m.
Good work, Noble Team!	DHalo	8/26/10 9:40 a.m.
Re: AN ANSWER *SP*	}SoC{BrownSound	8/26/10 11:38 a.m.
Re: AN ANSWER *SP*	DHalo	8/26/10 11:58 a.m.
Re: AN ANSWER *SP*	}SoC{BrownSound	8/26/10 12:09 p.m.
Re: AN ANSWER *SP*	AsiansOnFire	8/26/10 1:03 p.m.
Freaking epic.	mattroe	8/26/10 9:08 a.m.
Re: Freaking epic.	padraig08	8/26/10 10:16 a.m.
extended version coming 6th of september	ElzarTheBam	8/26/10 9:41 a.m.
The music	PooBone	8/26/10 9:49 a.m.
well, there we have it.	GrimBrother IV	8/26/10 10:13 a.m.
Perfect.....	munky-058	8/26/10 10:19 a.m.
Blood Vi-o-leeence... *NM*	Morpheus	8/26/10 10:31 a.m.
Re: Blood Vi-o-leeence...	Archilen	8/26/10 10:40 a.m.
Re: Blood Vi-o-leeence...	GrimBrother IV	8/26/10 10:42 a.m.
Re: Blood Vi-o-leeence...	Archilen	8/26/10 1:26 p.m.
Re: Blood Vi-o-leeence...	Stephen L. (SoundEffect)	8/26/10 3:54 p.m.
Plot hole?	Archilen	8/26/10 10:49 a.m.
Re: Plot hole?	DHalo	8/26/10 10:54 a.m.
Possible rendezvous?	munky-058	8/26/10 10:55 a.m.
Re: New Reach Trailer!	DMFanella	8/26/10 11:20 a.m.
Re: I'm guessing that's how Kat loses her arm?	doober187	8/26/10 12:21 p.m.
Re: I'm guessing that's how Kat loses her arm?	doober187	8/26/10 12:22 p.m.
Re: I'm guessing that's how Kat loses her arm?	kanbo	8/26/10 12:39 p.m.
I love it. Watched it 6 times now.	Dustbunny27	8/26/10 1:21 p.m.
Re: I love it. Watched it 6 times now.	Mid7night	8/26/10 2:11 p.m.
Re: New Reach Trailer	GrimBrother IV	8/26/10 3:15 p.m.
Re: New Reach Trailer	DHalo	8/26/10 3:21 p.m.
Yak!	INSANEdrive	8/26/10 3:59 p.m.
Re: Yak!	DHalo	8/26/10 4:32 p.m.
Question	serpx	8/26/10 4:08 p.m.
Re: Question	DHalo	8/26/10 4:32 p.m.
Re: Question	serpx	8/26/10 4:53 p.m.
Re: Question	DHalo	8/26/10 5:08 p.m.
Thanks a lot. *NM*	serpx	8/26/10 8:36 p.m.
Re: It blew right after he threw it	FoolsRun	8/26/10 5:49 p.m.
Sorry but I have to disagree!	Injunfett	8/26/10 6:01 p.m.
Why would you expect that...?	stan	8/27/10 8:33 a.m.
Re: Why would you expect that...?	General Vagueness	8/28/10 11:19 a.m.
Re: New Reach Trailer	Anton P. Nym (aka Steve)	8/27/10 9:18 a.m.
Re: New Reach Trailer	GrimBrother IV	8/27/10 11:46 a.m.
Should have armor locked *NM*	telemachus	8/27/10 12:25 p.m.
Loved it. Great nod to First Strike too. *NM*	NsU Soldier	8/26/10 4:07 p.m.
Re: New Reach Trailer!	Someone	8/26/10 4:53 p.m.
Re: New Reach Trailer!	Ragashingo	8/26/10 9:38 p.m.
Re: New Reach Trailer!	jlm699	8/27/10 9:22 a.m.
I disagree about one thing...	stan	8/27/10 10:46 a.m.
I'd just like to point out...	stan	8/27/10 10:30 a.m.
Re: I'd just like to point out...	kanbo	8/27/10 10:56 a.m.