Frequently Asked Forum Questions | ||||
Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts | ||||
Re: More talk about Hydronium and Reach | |
Posted By: General Vagueness <General.Vagueness@Gmail.com> | Date: 6/30/09 11:11 a.m. |
In Response To: Re: More talk about Hydronium and Reach (Hunt3r) : 1. reach probably won't use Natal, it's a freaking shooter for Christ's sake There's a good chance it won't be used for most of the game. If they can develop the right hardware it could be very good with a shooter : 2. the Next Big Thing is going to be an RPG (he threw MMO in there to screw
It's possible but I wouldn't bet on it just yet : 3. Reach is at a playable state yay : 4. Bungie is still cooler than blizzard because they don't tell you
more yay : 5. Harold Ryan loev Quake I think he was just using it as a convenient thing to compare to, which people have been doing since it came out. : 6. Bungie's bitter over Halo Wars (and rightfully so) I think it's just an "I told you so" kind of thing, the thing told being that Bungie knows how to do Halo right and most people don't. It says right there on the box who made it so their reputation isn't hindered by it (and in fact may be helped by it) so there's no good reason to feel bitter unless they wanted to do an RTS and MS said no.
|
|
Replies: |
More talk about Hydronium and Reach | General Vagueness | 6/30/09 10:01 a.m. |
Re: More talk about Hydronium and Reach | CaptainTony | 6/30/09 10:10 a.m. |
Re: More talk about Hydronium and Reach | Hunt3r | 6/30/09 10:24 a.m. |
Re: More talk about Hydronium and Reach | General Vagueness | 6/30/09 11:11 a.m. |
Excellent stuff. *NM* | Ma1agate | 6/30/09 10:46 a.m. |
Re: More talk about Hydronium and Reach | bluerunner | 6/30/09 10:59 a.m. |
Re: More talk about Hydronium and Reach | GrimBrother One | 6/30/09 4:51 p.m. |
The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33. |