![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
||||
| Frequently Asked Forum Questions | ||||
| Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts | ||||
| I take this seriously. | |
| Posted By: Louis Wu <halo@bungie.org> | Date: 11/10/01 12:11 p.m. |
In Response To: Re: Again: (veebs) : I am assuming that you work for IGN. You're assuming wrong. : Have you ever considered tthe fact that
Absolutely nobody involved with this board pays my wages - bungie.org is 100% non-profit. (Non-profit, hell - non-MONEY-MAKING is more accurate. We cost our viewers exactly nothing to look at our content - no ads, no donation requests, no premium service sections.) I do this because I love the company, and I love the games. I don't have ANY affiliation with IGN (other than being a paying subscriber to their Insider service). IGN does what it does to make money. (And also, presumably, because they love gaming.) You may or may not agree with the concept of premium content - information available only to those who pay for it - but posting it here, or anywhere else, is simply stealing; it's taking something IGN is selling and giving it away for free, decreasing the chances that others will choose to pay for it. This is MY board, and I make the rules here - and one of the rules is that you don't post unpaid-for intellectual property here. : thought not. Although before everyone slags me off, I realise what you said
To put it less-than-politely... bullshit. If I steal the AI code for Halo, and post it to a public forum, are you telling me I can avoid violating intellectual copyright law by simply stating that I got it from Bungie? IGN wrote a review that they chose to make available only to those who pay them money. I think that's pretty silly, myself; Halo reviews are a dime-a-dozen, and this is EXACTLY the sort of article that should be on the free part of the site, in my opinion... but that was their prerogative - and you violate their rights by posting it somewhere where folks can see it without paying them for it. : veebs
This is a pretty serious issue - if you want to be taken lightly, post on lighter topics.
| |
|
| Replies: |
| IGN HALO REVIEW | Dan | 11/9/01 9:49 p.m. |
| Re: IGN HALO REVIEW | Darkman | 11/9/01 10:08 p.m. |
| Again: | Louis Wu | 11/9/01 10:16 p.m. |
| Re: Again: | Darkman | 11/9/01 10:30 p.m. |
| Re: Again: | veebs | 11/10/01 3:49 a.m. |
| Re: Again: | {mAc}Dark_Eagle | 11/10/01 4:27 a.m. |
| Re: Again: | Harry | 11/10/01 5:33 a.m. |
| I take this seriously. | Louis Wu | 11/10/01 12:11 p.m. |
| Re: I take this seriously. | veebs | 11/10/01 4:27 p.m. |
| Re: I take this seriously. | vector40 | 11/10/01 5:09 p.m. |
| i didn't know we had any *NM* | slumbermonkey | 11/10/01 7:09 p.m. |
| Two, actually... | Louis Wu | 11/10/01 7:11 p.m. |
| Re: I take this seriously. | Louis Wu | 11/10/01 7:22 p.m. |
| For comparison purposes, they rated Half-Life 9.5 *NM* | Skeletor | 11/9/01 11:09 p.m. |
| Well, you need to know this | A HALO FAN | 11/10/01 6:02 p.m. |
The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33. |