Frequently Asked Forum Questions
Search the HBO News Archives Any All Exact		Search the Halo Updates DBs Halo Halo2		Bungie Webcam HBO XBL Gamertags *Ar's Simple HTML Guide Shishka's Guide for Newcomers The Lowdown on Download Accelerators Red Loser's Anti-Spamming Guide Egg FAQ | More Egg Stuff c0ld's Movie Starter Guide Shishka's HaloPC Pre-Release FAQ 3.1 AutoMagic 117 StripzMaker
Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts

Re: Subtle . . .
Posted By: gspawn	Date: 11/28/05 3:59 p.m.
In Response To: Re: Subtle . . . (Bluestone) : The whole thing seems a bit fishy to me, doesn't sound true at all, and I've : never heard of people saying in Microsoft that they didn't like aspects of : Halo 2. Yup. Microsoft just HATED having Bungie crank out the most successful videogame launch ever in the history of consoles, and they're completely thankless for having Halo keep the Xbox going through much of its lifespan. That was just terrible. I mean why would they ever want to retain control of property that almost single-handedly pushed Xbox into profit for the first time since the project began? It just doesn't make sense! [/sarcasm] But after playing Stubbs, yes I'm sure Wideload could crank out Halo 3 and do it well. Love that game. Especially if they partnered with Bungie, as suggested. Instead of "contracting", they could send the work to the mother company. Interesting. And MMO games tend to suck, IMHO. So negatory on that one, please. I don't want World of Halocraft or Battlefield 2552. Aside from all that, I don't get the "subtle" part of the topic. Where is it? The double-use of "game"... er? "Whatever you want to say about Bungie... you're not gonna find a lot of prospects for a Microsoft-controlled studio that can do a better job with Halo 3. Until official information comes out about the game, however, I suppose it's fair game for articles like this... "

Message Index

Subtle . . .	Jillybean	11/28/05 1:15 p.m.
Re: Subtle . . .	Ollie	11/28/05 1:31 p.m.
Re: Subtle . . .	Cody Miller	11/28/05 1:32 p.m.
Re: Subtle . . .	Jillybean	11/28/05 1:36 p.m.
Re: Subtle . . .	Uriah	11/28/05 2:14 p.m.
Re: Subtle . . .	Michael Hogsett	11/28/05 2:24 p.m.
Re: Subtle . . .	Jillybean	11/28/05 2:30 p.m.
Re: Subtle . . .	Peptuck	11/28/05 2:49 p.m.
Re: Subtle . . .	mr_mcmurder	11/28/05 3:02 p.m.
Did you all take your stupid pills?	Miguel Chavez	11/29/05 1:13 a.m.
Re: Subtle . . .	Cody Miller	11/28/05 3:08 p.m.
Re: Subtle . . .	AfroRyan	11/28/05 2:50 p.m.
Re: Subtle . . .	nam	11/28/05 2:57 p.m.
Re: Subtle . . .	Uriah	11/28/05 3:07 p.m.
Re: Subtle . . .	Sweden-MB	11/28/05 3:12 p.m.
Re: Subtle . . .	Michael Hogsett	11/28/05 3:24 p.m.
Re: Subtle . . .	Bluestone	11/28/05 3:37 p.m.
Re: Subtle . . .	Echoes	11/28/05 3:53 p.m.
Re: Subtle . . .	Anton P. Nym (aka Steve)	11/28/05 4:16 p.m.
Re: Subtle . . .	Matt	11/28/05 5:17 p.m.
Re: Subtle . . .	Anton P. Nym (aka Steve)	11/28/05 5:24 p.m.
Re: Subtle . . .	Matt	11/28/05 6:01 p.m.
Proven	Narcogen	11/29/05 12:27 a.m.
Re: Subtle . . .	gspawn	11/28/05 3:59 p.m.
Re: Subtle . . .	Bluestone	11/28/05 4:09 p.m.
Re: Subtle . . .	Ragnarok	11/28/05 6:36 p.m.
Re: Subtle . . .	Matt	11/28/05 5:03 p.m.
Re: Subtle . . .	Narcogen	11/29/05 12:30 a.m.
Re: Subtle . . .	Matt	11/29/05 2:00 a.m.
Re: Subtle . . .	Narcogen	11/29/05 4:42 a.m.
Re: Subtle . . .	Matt	11/29/05 8:42 a.m.
Re: Subtle . . .	Narcogen	11/29/05 4:03 p.m.
Re: Subtle . . .	Matt	11/30/05 1:55 a.m.
That's great news!	AfroRyan	11/29/05 10:25 p.m.
Re: That's great news!	Matt	11/30/05 1:55 a.m.
Re: Subtle . . .	Narcogen	11/29/05 12:21 a.m.
Re: Subtle . . .	AfroRyan	11/30/05 12:48 p.m.
Re: Subtle . . .	Spec ops Grunt	11/28/05 4:26 p.m.
Question for The Boss.	Stuntmutt	11/28/05 4:52 p.m.
Re: Question for The Boss.	Louis Wu	11/28/05 5:01 p.m.
Re: Question for The Boss.	Ragnarok	11/28/05 6:43 p.m.
Re: Question for The Boss.	Louis Wu	11/28/05 8:02 p.m.
Re: Question for The Boss.	Sep7imus [subnova]	11/29/05 6:57 a.m.
Re: Question for The Boss.	Jillybean	11/29/05 4:46 p.m.