![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
/-/S'pht-Translator-Active/-/ |
![]() | Re: QT 2.0 vs QT 2.5 comparison | |
![]() | Posted By: GrimCleaver | Date: 7/12/11 2:03 p.m. |
![]() | In Response To: Re: QT 2.0 vs QT 2.5 comparison (Godot) : QT 2.0 is actually on the Marathon CD. If you don't have it then try here : http://forums.bungie.org/story/?noframes;read=59130 : Cheers
Yeah, I don't have the original M1 CD, just M2 and Trilogy -- Oh, oops, I just realized that the M1 Demo on the M2 CD comes with QT2.0! But, thanks for the link nonetheless! :)
|
![]() | |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() | |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() | Replies: |
![]() | QT 2.0 vs QT 2.5 comparison | Godot | 7/12/11 8:29 a.m. |
![]() | Re: QT 2.0 vs QT 2.5 comparison | Claude Errera | 7/12/11 9:31 a.m. |
![]() | Re: QT 2.0 vs QT 2.5 comparison | Hippieman | 7/12/11 10:04 a.m. |
![]() | Re: QT 2.0 vs QT 2.5 comparison | Craig Hardgrove | 7/12/11 10:03 a.m. |
![]() | Re: QT 2.0 vs QT 2.5 comparison | GrimCleaver | 7/12/11 1:40 p.m. |
![]() | Re: QT 2.0 vs QT 2.5 comparison | Godot | 7/12/11 1:53 p.m. |
![]() | Re: QT 2.0 vs QT 2.5 comparison | GrimCleaver | 7/12/11 2:03 p.m. |
![]() | |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() | Problems? Suggestions? Comments? Email maintainer@bungie.org Marathon's Story Forum is maintained with WebBBS 5.12. |