|QT 2.0 vs QT 2.5 comparison|
|Posted By: Godot||Date: 7/12/11 8:29 a.m.|
Ok here's the first test.
I have uploaded Flippant (in AIFF) recorded under QT 2.0 and QT 2.5. I think the differences are quite evident. Let me know what you think of the sound quality on the QT 2.0 version.
It was played on a G4 (Digital Audio) and recorded on one of the new iMacs using a standard 3.5mm Stereo Plug. Nothing fancy. I used Audacity to do the recording (default settings).
|QT 2.0 vs QT 2.5 comparison||Godot||7/12/11 8:29 a.m.|
|Re: QT 2.0 vs QT 2.5 comparison||Claude Errera||7/12/11 9:31 a.m.|
|Re: QT 2.0 vs QT 2.5 comparison||Hippieman||7/12/11 10:04 a.m.|
|Re: QT 2.0 vs QT 2.5 comparison||Craig Hardgrove||7/12/11 10:03 a.m.|
|Re: QT 2.0 vs QT 2.5 comparison||GrimCleaver||7/12/11 1:40 p.m.|
|Re: QT 2.0 vs QT 2.5 comparison||Godot||7/12/11 1:53 p.m.|
|Re: QT 2.0 vs QT 2.5 comparison||GrimCleaver||7/12/11 2:03 p.m.|
Problems? Suggestions? Comments? Email firstname.lastname@example.org
Marathon's Story Forum is maintained with WebBBS 5.12.