/-/S'pht-Translator-Active/-/ |
Re: QT 2.0 vs QT 2.5 comparison | ||
Posted By: Godot | Date: 7/12/11 1:53 p.m. | |
In Response To: Re: QT 2.0 vs QT 2.5 comparison (GrimCleaver) : Wow, that sounds great! This calls for another play-through of Marathon, with
QT 2.0 is actually on the Marathon CD. If you don't have it then try here http://forums.bungie.org/story/?noframes;read=59130 Cheers
|
|
Replies: |
QT 2.0 vs QT 2.5 comparison | Godot | 7/12/11 8:29 a.m. | |
Re: QT 2.0 vs QT 2.5 comparison | Claude Errera | 7/12/11 9:31 a.m. | |
Re: QT 2.0 vs QT 2.5 comparison | Hippieman | 7/12/11 10:04 a.m. | |
Re: QT 2.0 vs QT 2.5 comparison | Craig Hardgrove | 7/12/11 10:03 a.m. | |
Re: QT 2.0 vs QT 2.5 comparison | GrimCleaver | 7/12/11 1:40 p.m. | |
Re: QT 2.0 vs QT 2.5 comparison | Godot | 7/12/11 1:53 p.m. | |
Re: QT 2.0 vs QT 2.5 comparison | GrimCleaver | 7/12/11 2:03 p.m. |
|
Problems? Suggestions? Comments? Email maintainer@bungie.org Marathon's Story Forum is maintained with WebBBS 5.12. |