/-/S'pht-Translator-Active/-/ |
Re: When is canon, not canon | ||
Posted By: Jabberwok | Date: 2/1/11 4:21 p.m. | |
In Response To: Re: When is canon, not canon (Forrest of B.org) So I don't know what there specific beef is with Reach, but I assume it has something to do with the novels. And by these categories, the game takes precedence, which I completely agree with. It seems to me that the games are the source material, and so are canon by definition. : That treatise looks like a bunch of high-falutin' claptrap (and I say this as
: For the purpose of these scales, "authors" means the PEOPLE who
:
: Within each of these categories, materials released later are considered
: I imagine within the Halo development community, the Bungie-produced games
|
|
Replies: |
When is canon, not canon *LINK* | Godot | 2/1/11 5:43 a.m. | |
Re: When is canon, not canon | poenadare | 2/1/11 6:10 a.m. | |
Re: When is canon, not canon | Bob-B-Q | 2/1/11 6:18 a.m. | |
Re: When is canon, not canon | ukimalefu | 2/1/11 8:51 a.m. | |
Re: When is canon, not canon | Forrest of B.org | 2/1/11 4:03 p.m. | |
Re: When is canon, not canon | Jabberwok | 2/1/11 4:21 p.m. | |
Re: When is canon, not canon | Document | 3/7/11 9:09 p.m. | |
Re: When is canon, not canon | Jabberwok | 3/8/11 12:59 a.m. | |
Re: When is canon, not canon | Document | 3/8/11 2:13 p.m. | |
Re: When is canon, not canon | Jabberwok | 3/8/11 5:00 p.m. | |
clear, succinct, thumbs up *NM* | poenadare | 2/1/11 6:15 p.m. | |
Re: When is canon, not canon *LINK* | Khalil | 3/25/11 3:39 a.m. |
|
Problems? Suggestions? Comments? Email maintainer@bungie.org Marathon's Story Forum is maintained with WebBBS 5.12. |