|Re: When is canon, not canon|
|Posted By: Jabberwok||Date: 3/8/11 5:00 p.m.|
In Response To: Re: When is canon, not canon (Document)
: Fair enough. I think my main point is that abstract rules about
I agree. Though the rules seem like they might be useful as an argumentative tool when you have a bunch of different people asserting their views on what's true and what's not. Especially when you have things which are supposedly consistent being written by different authors.
When someone attacks Bungie for getting the thing that they created wrong, and saying that someone else got it right (someone who is not the intellectual property's originator, but is, in my limited view, along for the ride); my knee-jerk reaction is to become indignant.
|When is canon, not canon *LINK*||Godot||2/1/11 5:43 a.m.|
|Re: When is canon, not canon||poenadare||2/1/11 6:10 a.m.|
|Re: When is canon, not canon||Bob-B-Q||2/1/11 6:18 a.m.|
|Re: When is canon, not canon||ukimalefu||2/1/11 8:51 a.m.|
|Re: When is canon, not canon||Forrest of B.org||2/1/11 4:03 p.m.|
|Re: When is canon, not canon||Jabberwok||2/1/11 4:21 p.m.|
|Re: When is canon, not canon||Document||3/7/11 9:09 p.m.|
|Re: When is canon, not canon||Jabberwok||3/8/11 12:59 a.m.|
|Re: When is canon, not canon||Document||3/8/11 2:13 p.m.|
|Re: When is canon, not canon||Jabberwok||3/8/11 5:00 p.m.|
|clear, succinct, thumbs up *NM*||poenadare||2/1/11 6:15 p.m.|
|Re: When is canon, not canon *LINK*||Khalil||3/25/11 3:39 a.m.|
Problems? Suggestions? Comments? Email firstname.lastname@example.org
Marathon's Story Forum is maintained with WebBBS 5.12.