/-/S'pht-Translator-Active/-/


Re: When is canon, not canon
Posted By: Forrest of B.orgDate: 2/1/11 4:03 p.m.

In Response To: When is canon, not canon *LINK* (Godot)

That treatise looks like a bunch of high-falutin' claptrap (and I say this as someone with a bona fide degree in high-falutin' claptrap) so I haven't read it yet, but on the same subject I would once again like to crosspost something that we worked up after the Myth 3 canon debates over at the Asylum (basically Myth Story Forum). These are the generally accepted "canon scales" we use for determining what information takes precedence over another, since Myth "canon" now contains so much contradictory information.

For the purpose of these scales, "authors" means the PEOPLE who were involved with the writing of the story, or their agents, NOT the company whose name was on the original product.


  • Category 1: "Canon"

    • Subcategory A: "Release Materials"
      Information from materials publically released by the authors.

    • Subcategory B: "Transrelease Materials"
      Information that exists BOTH in prerelease and postrelease materials (see Category 2 below).



  • Category 2: "Pseudocanon"

    • Subcategory A: "Prerelease Materials"
      Information from materials released prior to released materials, either promotionally or just leaked.

    • Subcategory B: "Postrelease Materials"
      Information from author-approved 3rd party products released as tie-ins to released materials.



  • Category 3: "Noncanon"

    • Subcategory A: "Legal Canon"
      Information from materials released by an entity that legally owns the franchise but is not the author.

    • Subcategory B: "Fan Canon"
      Information construed from the above sources by logical argument and generally accepted by the fans.



Within each of these categories, materials released later are considered "more canon", and within concurrent packaged materials (i.e. a game and it's manual) digital materials are considered "newer" than printed ones because they are easier to make last-minute changes in.

I imagine within the Halo development community, the Bungie-produced games (Halo 1, 2, 3, ODST, and Reach) fall under category 1A, while most everything else falls under categories 2B (those 3rd party projects Bungie personally checked off on, like the books or Halo Wars) or 3A (new things since Bungie has moved on past Halo), with particular propositions from other materials possibly falling under other categories due to recurrence in multiple places, etc.

[ Post a Reply | Message Index | Read Prev Msg | Read Next Msg ]
Pre-2004 Posts

Replies:

When is canon, not canon *LINK*Godot 2/1/11 5:43 a.m.
     Re: When is canon, not canonpoenadare 2/1/11 6:10 a.m.
     Re: When is canon, not canonBob-B-Q 2/1/11 6:18 a.m.
           Re: When is canon, not canonukimalefu 2/1/11 8:51 a.m.
     Re: When is canon, not canonForrest of B.org 2/1/11 4:03 p.m.
           Re: When is canon, not canonJabberwok 2/1/11 4:21 p.m.
                 Re: When is canon, not canonDocument 3/7/11 9:09 p.m.
                       Re: When is canon, not canonJabberwok 3/8/11 12:59 a.m.
                             Re: When is canon, not canonDocument 3/8/11 2:13 p.m.
                                   Re: When is canon, not canonJabberwok 3/8/11 5:00 p.m.
           clear, succinct, thumbs up *NM*poenadare 2/1/11 6:15 p.m.
     Re: When is canon, not canon *LINK*Khalil 3/25/11 3:39 a.m.

[ Post a Reply | Message Index | Read Prev Msg | Read Next Msg ]
Pre-2004 Posts

 

 

Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If you'd like to include a link to another page with your message,
please provide both the URL address and the title of the page:

Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:

 

 

Problems? Suggestions? Comments? Email maintainer@bungie.org

Marathon's Story Forum is maintained with WebBBS 5.12.