![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
||||
| Frequently Asked Forum Questions | ||||
| Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts | ||||
| Re: My Comprehensive-ish Argument With Narcogen | |
| Posted By: Stephen L. (SoundEffect) <soundeffect@hotmail.com> | Date: 5/30/11 8:15 p.m. |
|
: As for dates, you're absolutely correct. The conflicting dates between Halo: : Reach and TFoR are not just minor discrepancies. They are beyond : reconciliation. If Reach is canon, then the last third of TFOR is rendered : non-canonical. It's also been pointed out that if the events of the : Battle of Reach as shown in TFoR are wiped away, then we may also have : reject all chronologically subsequent novels. : As for ship designs, don't forget that the incarnation of the Enterprise in
I wan't meaning to point out the Enterprise as an inconsistency, just that within the Trek story there's a reason why the TOS enterprise and the Movie Enterprise are very similar at a casual glance but they are really different ships with different lengths, widths, deck counts, exterior features, etc. We're being asked to accept the Reach Autumn as the same ship as in Halo 1 but the same types of things have been changed but there's no such backstory to help us swallow that pill. By the way, I actually know more about Trek than I do Halo.
| |
|
| Replies: |
The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33. |