Frequently Asked Forum Questions
Search the HBO News Archives Any All Exact		Search the Halo Updates DBs Halo Halo2		Bungie Webcam HBO XBL Gamertags *Ar's Simple HTML Guide Shishka's Guide for Newcomers The Lowdown on Download Accelerators Red Loser's Anti-Spamming Guide Egg FAQ | More Egg Stuff c0ld's Movie Starter Guide Shishka's HaloPC Pre-Release FAQ 3.1 AutoMagic 117 StripzMaker
Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts

Re: The Forerunners shouldn't have lost the war.
Posted By: Peptuck	Date: 5/3/08 11:11 p.m.
: I'm asking you to prove that they lacked that capability. Can't prove a negative. Basic rules of debating, 101. You're the one who says they should have had that capability, burden of proof is on you to SHOW that they had that capability. : I'm asking you to provide evidence they were and it failed. If your conclusion that they had these factories holds up, it automatically proves that the Sentinels were ineffective, as the Forerunner lost. : Not the entire galaxy, but probably most of it. All I've got to go on is that : they were the most technologically advanced civilization in the galaxy at : that time. Could you provide some proof they DIDN'T have widespread : control? You said they were in control of all of the galaxy, yet you haven't proved they were. In other words, you made a claim without providing evidence to back it up, and I called you to provide proof on it. You counter by saying I have to provide proof that they weren't? Burden of proof is on you to show that they did have control over the entire galaxy.

Message Index