Frequently Asked Forum Questions
Search the HBO News Archives Any All Exact		Search the Halo Updates DBs Halo Halo2		Bungie Webcam HBO XBL Gamertags *Ar's Simple HTML Guide Shishka's Guide for Newcomers The Lowdown on Download Accelerators Red Loser's Anti-Spamming Guide Egg FAQ | More Egg Stuff c0ld's Movie Starter Guide Shishka's HaloPC Pre-Release FAQ 3.1 AutoMagic 117 StripzMaker
Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts

Re: The Forerunners shouldn't have lost the war.
Posted By: Peptuck	Date: 5/3/08 10:17 p.m.
: Of course it is, but apparently they didn't deploy billions to each planet : because if they did they would have won the war. Again, you keep saying that deployig billions of Sentinels would have won the war,w hen we'vee seen sentinel performance against energy weapons like what the forerunner used and what the Flood would have access to, and we don't know what the Flood were like during the Forerunners' time. In other words, you need to prove the Sentinels would win in the first place. : Because of the mention of combat skins, which is the Forerunner body armor. : The deployment of organisms against the Flood is inherently dangerous : because of the risk of infection. However, billions of replacable robots : deployed against the Flood not only provides fearsome firepower, but they : are also immune to infection. They weren't deploying biological troops against the Flood. The troops defending the planet were already stationed there when it was attacked, and there's no evidence they were Forerunner troops and not the local planetary defense force.

Message Index