Frequently Asked Forum Questions
Search the HBO News Archives Any All Exact		Search the Halo Updates DBs Halo Halo2		Bungie Webcam HBO XBL Gamertags *Ar's Simple HTML Guide Shishka's Guide for Newcomers The Lowdown on Download Accelerators Red Loser's Anti-Spamming Guide Egg FAQ | More Egg Stuff c0ld's Movie Starter Guide Shishka's HaloPC Pre-Release FAQ 3.1 AutoMagic 117 StripzMaker
Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts

Re: The Forerunners shouldn't have lost the war.
Posted By: Honestly <Hadjorim@yahoo.com>	Date: 5/3/08 10:00 p.m.
: And? What's your point? That doesn't matter if they didn't have these : facilitie suntil toward the very end of the war. But if they DID build them sooner and mass produced huge armies of sentinels they'd have won. : More importantly, if the Flood were assaulting a planet's surface, and all : wordls were controlled by the Forerunner like you believe, they would be : armed with both numbers and Forerunner tech, Indeed, but you can't use a weapon that much if you're cut to ribbons before you can fire it. : and would be highly evolved : Flood that would make the ones encountered in Halo look like irate lab : rats. Evidence. XD : Don't need billions of ships. They just need enough to carry their troops. No, but you said billions. : When the hell did I say that? I said they weren't sending troops into combat : when they could glass the planets from orbit, I never said that major : military forces were being discontinued. There's not even any evidence of : this taking place, either. No, but what's the point of deploying military soldiers onto a planet's surface when you're going to glass it?

Message Index