Frequently Asked Forum Questions
Search the HBO News Archives Any All Exact		Search the Halo Updates DBs Halo Halo2		Bungie Webcam HBO XBL Gamertags *Ar's Simple HTML Guide Shishka's Guide for Newcomers The Lowdown on Download Accelerators Red Loser's Anti-Spamming Guide Egg FAQ | More Egg Stuff c0ld's Movie Starter Guide Shishka's HaloPC Pre-Release FAQ 3.1 AutoMagic 117 StripzMaker
Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts

Re: The Forerunners shouldn't have lost the war.
Posted By: Honestly <Hadjorim@yahoo.com>	Date: 5/3/08 9:31 p.m.
: You assume they has the resources to deploy Sentinels in sufficient numbers : to counteract the Flood across the entire galaxy when the Terminals make : it expressly clear they had withdrawn combat forces back to within the : Magniot line defenses and make reference to how exhausted their resources : were by that point. Didact even makes it clear that the deployment of : Mendicant Bias' forces will use all of their available resources. You reference to the end of the war, when it was already too late. If they'd mass-produced sentinels sooner, the Flood would not have made such gains. : More importantly, you need to provide evidence that the Forerunner were NOT : using large numbers of Sentinels on the surfaces of their worlds and that : these were insufficient to stop the Flood threat. If they were, they would have won. =) : Evidence of this. From Halopedia: The fact that The Halos were scattered around the galaxy also hints at the possibility that the Forerunner empire covered most, if not all, of the galaxy.

Message Index