|Frequently Asked Forum Questions|
|Search Older Posts on This Forum:|
Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts
|Re: Now I really think there's a Sino-rific connec|
|Posted By: Frofalcon <firstname.lastname@example.org>||Date: 4/9/06 4:01 p.m.|
In Response To: Re: Now I really think there's a Sino-rific connec (Walshicus)
: The phraseology doesn't strike you as similar? Perhaps it's just me then.
I see the similarity. On top of that, the domestic policy was very similar as well. Unity of population, a union of society and state justified by Heaven. Add to that the fact that the Qing emperors were usurpers from Manchuria who held all the top positions, while the bulk of the intellectual and working classes were Han Chinese, held together in an uneasy union, that broke into an overthrow of the Qing Dynasty. Much as the prophets rule uneasily over the covenant with the elites as the muscle and force behind the operations.
|Now I really think there's a Sino-rific connection||Walshicus||4/8/06 11:21 a.m.|
|Re: Now I really think there's a Sino-rific connec||Jackal Fister||4/8/06 2:09 p.m.|
|Re: Now I really think there's a Sino-rific connec||Walshicus||4/8/06 2:35 p.m.|
|Re: Now I really think there's a Sino-rific connec||Frofalcon||4/9/06 4:01 p.m.|
|I give this theory a thumbs-up. *NM*||LostRock11||4/8/06 2:18 p.m.|
|Re: Now I really think there's a Sino-rific connec||UrsusArctos||5/1/06 7:43 p.m.|
The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33.