glyphstrip FAQ button
Halo.bungie.org
glyphstrip
Frequently Asked Forum Questions
 Search the HBO News Archives

Any All Exact 
Search the Halo Updates DBs

Halo Halo2 
Search Older Posts on This Forum:
Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts


Re: More Flood Biology
Posted By: punji73 <punji1973@hotmail.com>Date: 2/23/05 3:10 a.m.

In Response To: Re: More Flood Biology (mrbananas)

: i don't think any brain is required, remember how in the infected host the
: head has become unneeded so it just flopps agianst the shoulder, and
: remember how you can shoot the head off of the flood and they wouldn't
: even flinch. all it needs is the spinal cord to transmit movement nerve
: messages. the infection from becomes the new brain.
you are right there, in the book "halo, the flood" where captain keyes and his ill fated crew stumble upon the room where the flood infection forms are kept they are over whelmed by the creatures and one jumps onto keyes and inserts a sharp tentacle between his shoulder blades and wriggles its way to his spinal cord and he suddenly feels a foul presence in his mind. and the strange entity sifts through his memorys sorting out things of importance, say navigating a star ship for instance. this is where the benefit of finding a live host pays off. meanwhile when jenkins is infected he wakes up a while later to find that he also has an intruder in his mind and it starts jerking his muscles like a child experimenting with a new toy. which means the flood finds its own way of learning to control an alien body. so therefore a normal flood combat form can control a host which is dead but a 'flood brain' like the one that formed out of keyes much prefers a live host to be of any use


Message Index




Replies:

Of OP, flood and biologyZak Anderson 2/21/05 3:14 a.m.
     Re: Of OP, flood and biologymooniejohnson 2/21/05 3:17 a.m.
           Re: Of OP, flood and biologyJJMeH 2/21/05 3:20 a.m.
     Re: Of OP, flood and biologyZak Anderson 2/21/05 3:18 a.m.
     OK GOT A WORKING LINK NOWZak Anderson 2/21/05 4:32 a.m.
           Re: OK GOT A WORKING LINK NOWmooniejohnson 2/21/05 5:10 a.m.
                 Re: OK GOT A WORKING LINK NOWZak Anderson 2/22/05 2:25 a.m.
                       Re: OK GOT A WORKING LINK NOWmrbananas 2/22/05 9:37 a.m.
           Re: OK GOT A WORKING LINK NOWHawk7886 2/21/05 5:12 a.m.
                 Here's a better one.Louis Wu 2/21/05 5:22 a.m.
                       Re: Here's a better one.Jillybean 2/21/05 7:25 a.m.
                             Re: Here's a better one.MC vince 2/21/05 10:26 a.m.
                                   Re: Here's a better one.Jillybean 2/21/05 1:23 p.m.
                                         Q&ASlith 2/21/05 1:40 p.m.
                                               Re: Q&AZak Anderson 2/22/05 2:20 a.m.
                                                     More Flood BiologySlith 2/22/05 3:56 p.m.
                                                           Re: More Flood BiologySlith 2/22/05 4:14 p.m.
                                                                 The Flood HomeworldSlith 2/22/05 4:35 p.m.
                                                                       Re: The Flood Homeworldpunji73 2/23/05 3:22 a.m.
                                                                 Re: More Flood Biologymrbananas 2/22/05 5:13 p.m.
                                                                       Re: More Flood BiologySlith 2/22/05 5:24 p.m.
                                                                       Re: More Flood Biologyselmack 2/22/05 6:54 p.m.
                                                                       Re: More Flood Biologypunji73 2/23/05 3:10 a.m.
                                                                             Re: More Flood BiologySlith 2/23/05 11:51 a.m.
                                                                                   Re: More Flood Biologymrbananas 2/23/05 1:14 p.m.
                                                                                         Re: More Flood BiologySlith 2/23/05 5:32 p.m.
                                         Re: Here's a better one.Gil Galahad 2/21/05 4:02 p.m.
                                               Re: Here's a better one.Jillybean 2/21/05 4:27 p.m.
                                   Re: Here's a better one.Finn 2/22/05 6:54 p.m.
     Excellent work. Good reasoning. *NM*Anton P. Nym (aka Steve) 2/21/05 11:20 a.m.
     read Starhammer? *NM*Anonymous Cowardly Fool 2/21/05 7:40 p.m.



contact us

The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33.