> No, Frank. I saw the page to which he was referring - a real cuneiform
> "14" would not be without the lines drawn down from the
> triangles. Using triangle imprints without the lines make different
> symbols.

If you look closely at the glyph you see the 'dots' are two pixels- a darker one on top and a lighter one below. Seems to me that's about as close as you could come to a triangle with a line below it in two pixels.