/-/S'pht-Translator-Active/-/ |
Re: Is #54 numerically special? | ||
Posted By: TheZealotQ | Date: 7/31/02 12:49 a.m. | |
In Response To: Re: Is #54 numerically special? (Andrew Nagy) i always thought that 54 meant 5+4=9. So then we were the 9th of the 10 cyborgs at tau ceti/ |
|
Replies: |
#54 | paolo mk IV | 6/9/02 3:06 p.m. | |
Re: #54 | REB | 6/9/02 4:02 p.m. | |
Re: #54 | Yossarian | 6/9/02 6:37 p.m. | |
Re: #54 | Johannes Gunnar | 6/10/02 12:02 p.m. | |
Is #54 numerically special? | Agent Cletus | 6/13/02 11:21 a.m. | |
Re: Is #54 numerically special? | Hamish Sinclair | 6/13/02 11:46 a.m. | |
Re: Is #54 numerically special? | Agent Cletus | 6/13/02 4:37 p.m. | |
Re: Is #54 numerically special? | Andrew Nagy | 6/19/02 7:34 p.m. | |
Re: Is #54 numerically special? | TheZealotQ | 7/31/02 12:49 a.m. |
Problems? Suggestions? Comments? Email maintainer@bungie.org Marathon's Story Forum is maintained with WebBBS 5.12. |