/-/S'pht-Translator-Active/-/


QT 2.0 vs QT 2.5 comparison
Posted By: GodotDate: 7/12/11 8:29 a.m.

Ok here's the first test.

I have uploaded Flippant (in AIFF) recorded under QT 2.0 and QT 2.5. I think the differences are quite evident. Let me know what you think of the sound quality on the QT 2.0 version.

It was played on a G4 (Digital Audio) and recorded on one of the new iMacs using a standard 3.5mm Stereo Plug. Nothing fancy. I used Audacity to do the recording (default settings).

http://marathon.bungie.org/story/_files/Flippant_AIFF_Comparison.zip

Cheers
Hamish

[ Post a Reply | Message Index | Read Prev Msg | Read Next Msg ]
Pre-2004 Posts

Replies:

QT 2.0 vs QT 2.5 comparisonGodot 7/12/11 8:29 a.m.
     Re: QT 2.0 vs QT 2.5 comparisonClaude Errera 7/12/11 9:31 a.m.
           Re: QT 2.0 vs QT 2.5 comparisonHippieman 7/12/11 10:04 a.m.
     Re: QT 2.0 vs QT 2.5 comparisonCraig Hardgrove 7/12/11 10:03 a.m.
     Re: QT 2.0 vs QT 2.5 comparisonGrimCleaver 7/12/11 1:40 p.m.
           Re: QT 2.0 vs QT 2.5 comparisonGodot 7/12/11 1:53 p.m.
                 Re: QT 2.0 vs QT 2.5 comparisonGrimCleaver 7/12/11 2:03 p.m.

[ Post a Reply | Message Index | Read Prev Msg | Read Next Msg ]
Pre-2004 Posts

 

 

Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If you'd like to include a link to another page with your message,
please provide both the URL address and the title of the page:

Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:
 

 

Problems? Suggestions? Comments? Email maintainer@bungie.org

Marathon's Story Forum is maintained with WebBBS 5.12.