/-/S'pht-Translator-Active/-/ |
Re: Rubicon Volunteers - Like Flies on a Corpse | ||
Posted By: Forrest of B.org | Date: 4/2/04 12:41 p.m. | |
In Response To: Re: Rubicon Volunteers - Like Flies on a Corpse (Yossarian) : Where I come from originally, it's "Eddin-boro", because there's no
: Old Scottish is more of a Celtic language, and therefore not closely related
That was "old Scottish" with a lower-case "o", to distinguish from English as spoken in Scottland today (which some might call "Scottish", incorrectly). Old Scottish being an ancestor of Scottish. And are you sure it's entirely Celtic? I can see Celtic parts in it, just as English has French parts, but I saw an IE language chart somewhere that claimed something like "many linguists consider Scottish to be a variant of English, while in fact it is an offshoot from earlier in the tree, closely related to, but not a variant of, English." : It's Latin corrupted by the Germanic vernacular of the Franks Right. : as opposed to
Like English. : Latin took dominance because it was the language of the church, the
Right right right. : As for criticizing the spelling, pronunciation, and syllable characteristics
I hate English too, though it's mostly because modern English is a mushpot of other languages and their conventions intermixed. Old English actually made some sense, at least as much as French. I just think French is funky from a purely design viewpoint - how does something like "-eaux" make an "oh" sound? (I can see how "ea-ooh", the 'x' being pronounced as an aspirant, could devolve over centuries into a single dipthong that eventually becomes "oh", but then just drop the damn letters already!) Same thing for "-ois" being pronounced "ua", etc. VIVA LA QUENYA! ;-)
|
|
Replies: |
|
Problems? Suggestions? Comments? Email maintainer@bungie.org Marathon's Story Forum is maintained with WebBBS 5.12. |