Frequently Asked Forum Questions | ||||
Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts | ||||
Re: Rangers = Infection Forms - justification *LON | |
Posted By: Warbow <warbowhalo@aol.com> | Date: 2/10/03 12:14 p.m. |
In Response To: Rangers = Infection Forms - justification *LONG* (Ciarán) : Then why is called the Carrier by Bungie and not the Ranger? Because most people know them as Carrier. : No, I think the Infection Form is what 343GS is referring to. "The small
: From dictionary.com:
: A warden employed to maintain and protect a natural area, such as a forest or
: The first definition of "A wanderer; a rover" would certainly be a
This definition can also apply to the Carrier form as well. They seem to range around looking for someone to bump into : I also think that his comment "As long as any hosts remain, the Flood is
[snip] : If it's a Carrier, it makes more Infection Forms, and on we go. But if it's a
Or maybe the Warrior forms become the Carrier forms when they are no longer useful as warriors. If one warrior forms still exists then it could create more spores/infection forms and the Flood would continue to spread. |
|
Replies: |
The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33. |