Frequently Asked Forum Questions
Search the HBO News Archives Any All Exact		Search the Halo Updates DBs Halo Halo2		Bungie Webcam HBO XBL Gamertags *Ar's Simple HTML Guide Shishka's Guide for Newcomers The Lowdown on Download Accelerators Red Loser's Anti-Spamming Guide Egg FAQ | More Egg Stuff c0ld's Movie Starter Guide Shishka's HaloPC Pre-Release FAQ 3.1 AutoMagic 117 StripzMaker
Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts

Re: My Halo/GS/Forerunner theory (in FAQ format) *
Posted By: vector40 <vector40@aol.com>	Date: 1/31/02 9:05 p.m.
In Response To: Re: My Halo/GS/Forerunner theory (in FAQ format) * (Rookie) : Do you have a source for this information? The number "04" — as in, Installation 04. That implies, obviously, that there's at least three others, but also that there's more than ten — otherwise, why ZERO four? : I don't think that it would even require a single infection form. I heard : somewhere that the flood operates at its lowest form as a spore. I : couldn't tell you where I heard that however. I think the main reason why : the flood would survive the pulse is because their lowest form IS the : spore, which is probably nearly indestructible, and possibly the reason : why Covenant Elites can be infected even with their sheilds on. My personal thought is that shields are impervious. Elites have theirs dropped before being infected. Consider the Master Chief. Infection flood explode against shields, according to the "Flood Guide." : And to hold the index. We wouldn't want to forget that. That may have been a secondary function — certainly important, but along the lines of storing the codes to a nuclear weapon in the base vault. It's just the most logical, and probably most secure place. : This is an ambiguous topic. There is no way to verify that GS was talking : about the Forerunners. This is all ambiguous :) Just theories. : Another way to do what? Wipe out the Flood — short of annihilating the galaxy :)

Message Index

My Halo/GS/Forerunner theory (in FAQ format) *SP*	NthDegree256	1/31/02 8:07 p.m.
Great!	vector40	1/31/02 8:29 p.m.
Re: My Halo/GS/Forerunner theory (in FAQ format) *	Rookie	1/31/02 8:41 p.m.
Re: My Halo/GS/Forerunner theory (in FAQ format) *	Louis Wu	1/31/02 9:04 p.m.
Suggestion: Think in terms of 50,000	NthDegree256	1/31/02 9:12 p.m.
Re: Suggestion: Think in terms of 50,000	Louis Wu	1/31/02 9:36 p.m.
Five would work	Ohso	1/31/02 10:10 p.m.
Pulse overlap . . .	Surrepticius	1/31/02 10:16 p.m.
Hmm —	vector40	1/31/02 10:51 p.m.
A Scale Example	poena.dare #CP#g	2/1/02 12:08 a.m.
Nice	mnemesis	2/1/02 12:15 a.m.
Re: A Scale Example	Jonah	2/1/02 8:10 a.m.
Your galaxy's too small. Shouldn't it be 150,000? *NM*	NthDegree256	2/1/02 2:19 p.m.
No, it is approx. 100,000 light years across *NM*	Ohso	2/1/02 3:48 p.m.
Re: My Halo/GS/Forerunner theory (in FAQ format) *	NthDegree256	1/31/02 9:04 p.m.
Re: My Halo/GS/Forerunner theory (in FAQ format) *	MakeMineRed	2/1/02 7:25 a.m.
Re: My Halo/GS/Forerunner theory (in FAQ format) *	vector40	2/1/02 8:44 p.m.
Re: My Halo/GS/Forerunner theory (in FAQ format) *	vector40	1/31/02 9:05 p.m.
Re: My Halo/GS/Forerunner theory (in FAQ format) *	-Jäger	2/1/02 7:22 p.m.
Re: My Halo/GS/Forerunner theory (in FAQ format) *	vector40	2/1/02 8:45 p.m.
Re: My Halo/GS/Forerunner theory (in FAQ format) *	NthDegree256	2/2/02 4:24 p.m.
Re: My Halo/GS/Forerunner theory (in FAQ format) *	Jeff	2/3/02 12:32 a.m.
Re: My Halo/GS/Forerunner theory (in FAQ format) *	Jeff	2/3/02 12:37 a.m.
Re: My Halo/GS/Forerunner theory (in FAQ format) *	NthDegree256	2/4/02 9:43 p.m.
Re: My Halo/GS/Forerunner theory (in FAQ format) *	Jeff	2/4/02 10:43 p.m.