Frequently Asked Forum Questions | ||||
Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts | ||||
Re: Your analysis is grossly incomplete | |
Posted By: Hoovaloov | Date: 1/17/12 5:21 p.m. |
In Response To: Re: Your analysis is grossly incomplete (Schooly D) : Without knowing the math that governs how the reticule increases/decreases, : this can't be said for sure. With less bloom, it also takes less time for : the reticule to reset for the pacer, allowing a quicker ROF. It's possible : that the quicker ROF for the pacer outweighs the smaller reticule for the : spammer. Thanks for helping clarify my point. This is exactly the question I wanted to answer in this experiment. And since 85% bloom increased or equaled the number of pacing wins at all ranges, then I conclude that the quicker ROF for the pacers DOES outweight the smaller reticule for the spammer.
|
|
Replies: |
The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33. |