glyphstrip FAQ button
Halo.bungie.org
glyphstrip
Frequently Asked Forum Questions
 Search the HBO News Archives

Any All Exact 
Search the Halo Updates DBs

Halo Halo2 
Search Older Posts on This Forum:
Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts


Re: Forget canon, what about the story itself
Posted By: Stephen L. (SoundEffect) <soundeffect@hotmail.com>Date: 1/3/12 4:19 p.m.

In Response To: Re: Forget canon, what about the story itself (Revenant1988)


: I will say that I had trouble feeling much for the characters in Reach. There
: are a few reasons for this.

: 1:) From the beginning, you know not to get attached to them because you know
: they are all going to die.
: 2:) Call me a purist, but when I thought of Noble team in the early days, I
: figured it would all be
: S-II so when it was revealed that they were S-III I lost a little interest
: because again, I knew they were going to be disposable heroes. Jorge was
: an exception to this, being the first S-II in a game (other than halo
: wars) that you get to interact with outside of Master Chief.
: 3:) I actually was not a fan of seeing the other spartans faces. Regardless
: of being a II or a III, I've always liked the fact that they were
: faceless, but you could still tell them apart by their mannerisms. Ever
: since Nylunds TFoR, I've imagined a squad of spartans that look like
: Master Chief, but are not Master Chief. Being able to tell them apart with
: subtle differences in their armor markings or service numbers is what I
: wanted to see. The way they were done in Halo Wars is my favorite, and how
: I would like to see it in the future. Does that make them a little harder
: to tell apart? Generic? Yes, but I don't like seeing all the crazy
: variations of the armors. For me, it became hard to look at them any
: differently than just MP avatars you see in MP. In Halo 3 for instance,
: you could make your spartan look just stock like Master Chief, but you
: could not get his exact color. To me, that makes a world of difference for
: some reason. I know to treat MP and Campaign worlds differently, but on a
: sub-conscience level it makes me notice it and it affects my thinking, my
: ability to connect to them as story characters and not just MP avatars.
: For me, its about finding that perfect balance between making them stand
: apart just enough while still making them fit with everyone else. I don't
: know if that makes sense or not, to me it does.

: What I will say to you regarding the way they each died: 1.) Not every
: spartan is supposed to be Master Chief. They are different. Remember, he's
: just "lucky" compared to the others. The most well rounded. Not
: the best sniper, not the best heavy specialists, not the communications
: guy, not the best leader. He is what you might say, the best symbol.

: 2.) Kat getting shot in the head makes total sense. As Loftus pointed out,
: there is a reason the shields didn't do their job. Remember, Spartan armor
: in the universe is a tad different than how it behaves in game. I feel
: like I'm beating a dead horse with this since I say it to these die-hards
: so often, but some things are just for gameplay. GAMEPLAY. They need to be
: taken at face value. In Nylunds TFoR, before the spartans get the upgrade
: to their armor that gives them shields, all it is is just a suit of armor.
: Its not bullet proof, its not plasma proof, its bullet and plasma
: resistant Just like with body armor today, there is only so much damage
: they can take before they loose their overall usefulness. Once it passes
: that threshold, its not going to do its job. The shields supplement this.
: It is to keep them alive, where had they been exposed, they would die.
: When Sam takes that plasma to his chest, his armor saves his life. Had he
: been clothed like a marine, he'd be toast. The only reason he dies, it
: that he can't go back into space since the seal has been breached. No
: helmet is totally bullet proof either, so while kats helmet might have
: deflected a small arms fire round, human based, anything larger, armor
: piercing, or plasma based is still going to go through her face like a
: knife through butter. Can you imagine how thick a helmet would need to be
: to stop something like that, without shields?

: 3.) Carter was already mortally wounded by this point. How else can he be
: useful aside from distracting the Covenant from 6 and Emile? By taking a
: few out with him. makes sense to me. Again, not every Spartan, especially
: a Spartan III is going to be like Master Chief. Again, remember to take
: some of the game play stuff at face value. Yes, we destroy several scarabs
: in H2-H3 as Master Chief, but that doesn't matter because hes the
: goddamned Batma- ER Master Chief. Could other Spartans take one down
: individually? Probably. It would still likely be a suicide mission. Even
: Chief had help from the UNSC for most of them, and the ones you can take
: out in ODST as an ODST you still have help from your other ODST's.

: TL;DR: I too, had trouble connecting with the S-III's, but I don't have a
: problem with what they did or how they died in the game.

I agree with almost all of this. The in-universe behavior and physics may differ from gameplay concessions and the player/reader has to be able to divorce the two concepts or things won't make sense.

My HBO Articles



Message Index




Replies:

As much as I enjoyed Reach . . .Seraph XXVII 1/3/12 4:55 a.m.
     Re: As much as I enjoyed Reach . . .FyreWulff 1/3/12 5:08 a.m.
           ^like face book we need a dislike button. :)Bryan Newman 1/3/12 5:55 a.m.
                 Re: ^like face book we need a dislike button. :)FyreWulff 1/3/12 10:08 a.m.
                       Re: ^like face book we need a dislike button. :)Stephen L. (SoundEffect) 1/3/12 2:31 p.m.
                             Re: ^like face book we need a dislike button. :)FyreWulff 1/3/12 3:01 p.m.
                                   Re: ^like face book we need a dislike button. :)Stephen L. (SoundEffect) 1/3/12 4:08 p.m.
                                         I know the answer *img*Revenant1988 1/3/12 4:11 p.m.
                                               Re: I know the answer *img*LostSpartan987 1/3/12 5:45 p.m.
                                               Trololol *NM*stabbim 1/3/12 9:04 p.m.
                                         Re: ^like face book we need a dislike button. :)FyreWulff 1/3/12 5:32 p.m.
                                               Re: ^like face book we need a dislike button. :)Stephen L. (SoundEffect) 1/3/12 7:14 p.m.
                                   Re: didn't like the post title, oddly enoughGeneral Vagueness 1/3/12 5:10 p.m.
                                         Re: didn't like the post title, oddly enoughFyreWulff 1/3/12 5:25 p.m.
                                               Re: didn't like the post title, oddly enoughGeneral Vagueness 1/3/12 6:53 p.m.
                                                     Re: didn't like the post title, oddly enoughdavidfuchs 1/3/12 7:41 p.m.
                                                           Re: didn't like the post title, oddly enoughStephen L. (SoundEffect) 1/3/12 8:01 p.m.
                                                                 Re: didn't like the post title, oddly enoughQuirel 1/3/12 10:06 p.m.
           Re: As much as I enjoyed Reach . . .Gravemind 1/3/12 7:22 a.m.
                 Re: As much as I enjoy HBO . . .Hedgemony 1/3/12 9:27 a.m.
                       Re: As much as I enjoy HBO . . .DEEP NNN 1/3/12 12:25 p.m.
                             Re: As much as I enjoy HBO . . .FyreWulff 1/3/12 12:31 p.m.
                                   Re: As much as I enjoy HBO . . .DEEP NNN 1/3/12 12:59 p.m.
                 Re: As much as I enjoyed Reach . . .FyreWulff 1/3/12 10:03 a.m.
                       Re: As much as I enjoyed Reach . . .FyreWulff 1/3/12 10:07 a.m.
                             Re: As much as I enjoyed Reach . . .davidfuchs 1/3/12 1:42 p.m.
                                   Re: As much as I enjoyed Reach . . .General Vagueness 1/3/12 4:15 p.m.
                                         Re: As much as I enjoyed Reach . . .pete_the_duck 1/3/12 5:25 p.m.
                                               Re: As much as I enjoyed Reach . . .Gravemind 1/3/12 7:50 p.m.
                                                     Re: As much as I enjoyed Reach . . .pete_the_duck 1/3/12 9:57 p.m.
                                                           Re: As much as I enjoyed Reach . . .FyreWulff 1/4/12 12:58 a.m.
                       Re: As much as I enjoyed Reach . . .Gravemind 1/3/12 7:58 p.m.
           Yes! This is how I've always felt! ^Jillybean 1/3/12 6:52 p.m.
                 Re: Yes! This is how I've always felt! ^General Vagueness 1/3/12 7:17 p.m.
                       Re: Yes! This is how I've always felt! ^uberfoop 1/3/12 7:25 p.m.
                             Re: Yes! This is how I've always felt! ^General Vagueness 1/3/12 7:52 p.m.
                                   Re: Yes! This is how I've always felt! ^Vandle Valsher 1/3/12 7:57 p.m.
                                   Re: Yes! This is how I've always felt! ^uberfoop 1/3/12 8:23 p.m.
                                         Re: Yes! This is how I've always felt! ^Quirel 1/3/12 10:12 p.m.
                                               Re: Yes! This is how I've always felt! ^uberfoop 1/3/12 11:01 p.m.
                                                     Oh, unless...uberfoop 1/3/12 11:09 p.m.
                 Re: Yes! This is how I've always felt! ^Stephen L. (SoundEffect) 1/3/12 7:26 p.m.
                       My two Centscrzymnky069 1/4/12 5:43 a.m.
                             Re: My two CentsDevil Mingy 1/4/12 6:24 a.m.
                                   Re: My two CentsStephen L. (SoundEffect) 1/4/12 11:44 a.m.
                                         Sci-fi writers have no sense of scale.Gravemind 1/4/12 10:11 p.m.
                                               Re: Sci-fi writers have no sense of scale.Stephen L. (SoundEffect) 1/4/12 10:21 p.m.
                                                     Re: Sci-fi writers have no sense of scale.Quirel 1/4/12 11:10 p.m.
                                                           Re: Sci-fi writers have no sense of scale.Stephen L. (SoundEffect) 1/5/12 12:03 a.m.
                                                     Re: Sci-fi writers have no sense of scale.Gravemind 1/4/12 11:16 p.m.
                                                           Re: Sci-fi writers have no sense of scale.Quirel 1/4/12 11:47 p.m.
                                                           Re: Sci-fi writers have no sense of scale.Stephen L. (SoundEffect) 1/5/12 12:11 a.m.
                                                                 Re: Sci-fi writers have no sense of scale.Gravemind 1/5/12 12:24 a.m.
                                                                       Re: Sci-fi writers have no sense of scale.Stephen L. (SoundEffect) 1/5/12 2:19 a.m.
                                                                 Re: Sci-fi writers have no sense of scale.DHalo 1/5/12 2:36 a.m.
                                                                       Re: Sci-fi writers have no sense of scale.Stephen L. (SoundEffect) 1/5/12 2:45 a.m.
                                                                             Re: Sci-fi writers have no sense of scale.Quirel 1/5/12 4:18 a.m.
                                                                                   Re: Sci-fi writers have no sense of scale.Stephen L. (SoundEffect) 1/5/12 12:29 p.m.
                                                                       Re: Sci-fi writers have no sense of scale.Gravemind 1/5/12 4:07 a.m.
                                                                             Re: Sci-fi writers have no sense of scale.Stephen L. (SoundEffect) 1/5/12 12:42 p.m.
                                                                                   Re: Sci-fi writers have no sense of scale.DHalo 1/5/12 11:08 p.m.
                                                                 Re: Sci-fi writers have no sense of scale.DEEP NNN 1/5/12 2:41 a.m.
                                                                       Re: Sci-fi writers have no sense of scale.Stephen L. (SoundEffect) 1/5/12 2:50 a.m.
                                                                 Re: Sci-fi writers have no sense of scale.General Vagueness 1/5/12 5:02 a.m.
                                               Except for Douglas Adams *NM*scarab 1/4/12 11:10 p.m.
                                                     Well, yes, obviously. :) *NM*Gravemind 1/4/12 11:46 p.m.
                                               Re: Sci-fi writers have no sense of scale.General Vagueness 1/5/12 4:43 a.m.
                             Re: In this economy?Hedgemony 1/4/12 10:25 a.m.
     Re: As much as I enjoyed Reach . . .kanbo 1/3/12 5:25 a.m.
           AgreedFlynn J Taggart 1/3/12 9:21 a.m.
           Re: As much as I enjoyed Reach . . .DEEP NNN 1/3/12 12:22 p.m.
     Forget canon, what about the story itselfdavidfuchs 1/3/12 1:49 p.m.
           Re: Forget canon, what about the story itselfStephen L. (SoundEffect) 1/3/12 2:28 p.m.
                 Re: Forget canon, what about the story itselfdavidfuchs 1/3/12 3:13 p.m.
                       Re: Forget canon, what about the story itselfFyreWulff 1/3/12 3:22 p.m.
                             Re: Forget canon, what about the story itselfBeckx 1/3/12 3:23 p.m.
                                   Re: Forget canon, what about the story itselfstabbim 1/3/12 9:53 p.m.
                             Re: Forget canon, what about the story itselfRevenant1988 1/3/12 3:25 p.m.
                             Re: Forget canon, what about the story itselfLeisandir 1/3/12 3:34 p.m.
                                   Re: Forget canon, what about the story itselfFyreWulff 1/3/12 4:04 p.m.
                                         Re: Forget canon, what about the story itselfLeisandir 1/3/12 4:25 p.m.
                                               Re: Forget canon, what about the story itselfNsU Soldier 1/4/12 12:04 a.m.
                                         Re: Forget canon, what about the story itselfGeneral Vagueness 1/3/12 6:20 p.m.
                             Re: Forget canon, what about the story itselfGeneral Vagueness 1/3/12 6:11 p.m.
                                   Re: Forget canon, what about the story itselfstabbim 1/3/12 10:48 p.m.
                                         Re: Forget canon, what about the story itselfdavidfuchs 1/3/12 11:15 p.m.
                                               Re: Forget canon, what about the story itselfBeckx 1/3/12 11:28 p.m.
                                                     Re: Forget canon, what about the story itselfdavidfuchs 1/4/12 12:03 a.m.
           Re: Forget canon, what about the story itselfFyreWulff 1/3/12 3:11 p.m.
                 No, and yes.Revenant1988 1/3/12 3:20 p.m.
                       Re: No, and yes.General Vagueness 1/3/12 6:07 p.m.
                             Re: No, and yes.Stephen L. (SoundEffect) 1/3/12 7:18 p.m.
                                   Re: No, and yes.General Vagueness 1/3/12 7:42 p.m.
                                         Re: No, and yes.Stephen L. (SoundEffect) 1/3/12 8:03 p.m.
                                               What happened to Carter.NsU Soldier 1/4/12 12:46 a.m.
                                                     Re: What happened to Carter.stabbim 1/4/12 7:28 a.m.
                                                           Also...stabbim 1/4/12 7:29 a.m.
                                               Re: No, and yes.General Vagueness 1/4/12 6:01 a.m.
                                         Re: No, and yes.GrimBrother IV 1/3/12 8:28 p.m.
                                               Re: No, and yes.General Vagueness 1/4/12 6:29 a.m.
                                                     Re: No, and yes.Stephen L. (SoundEffect) 1/4/12 11:47 a.m.
                                                           Re: No, and yes.stabbim 1/4/12 4:16 p.m.
                                                                 Re: No, and yes.Stephen L. (SoundEffect) 1/4/12 5:03 p.m.
                                                                       Re: No, and yes.Leisandir 1/4/12 10:16 p.m.
                                                           Re: No, and yes.General Vagueness 1/5/12 4:05 a.m.
                                                                 Re: No, and yes.Stephen L. (SoundEffect) 1/5/12 12:38 p.m.
                 Re: Forget canon, what about the story itselfGeneral Vagueness 1/3/12 5:29 p.m.
                 Rightish, and wrong.Quirel 1/3/12 5:50 p.m.
                       Re: Rightish, and wrong.7he grunt w/a plasma pistol 1/3/12 6:04 p.m.
                       Re: Rightish, and wrong.Stephen L. (SoundEffect) 1/3/12 7:16 p.m.
                             Re: Rightish, and wrong.Quirel 1/3/12 10:06 p.m.
                                   Re: Rightish, and wrong.Stephen L. (SoundEffect) 1/3/12 11:28 p.m.
                 What about Harvest?BlueNinja 1/6/12 10:09 a.m.
                       Re: What about Harvest?Stephen L. (SoundEffect) 1/6/12 11:47 a.m.
                             Re: What about Harvest?BlueNinja 1/6/12 12:04 p.m.
                             Re: What about Harvest?The Loot 1/6/12 1:55 p.m.
                                   Re: What about Harvest?Stephen L. (SoundEffect) 1/6/12 3:47 p.m.
                                         Re: What about Harvest?Leviathan 1/6/12 6:54 p.m.
                                               Re: What about Harvest?Stephen L. (SoundEffect) 1/6/12 7:06 p.m.
                                                     Re: What about Harvest?Bry 1/6/12 11:36 p.m.
                             Re: What about Harvest?General Vagueness 1/6/12 6:58 p.m.
                                   Re: What about Harvest?Stephen L. (SoundEffect) 1/6/12 7:07 p.m.
                       Re: What about Harvest?Urban Reflex 1/6/12 2:19 p.m.
                             Re: What about Harvest?7he grunt w/a plasma pistol 1/6/12 2:26 p.m.
                             Re: What about Harvest?SonofMacPhisto 1/6/12 4:25 p.m.
                                   Re: What about Harvest?davidfuchs 1/6/12 5:38 p.m.
                                   Re: What about Harvest?Beckx 1/6/12 5:55 p.m.
           Re: Forget canon, what about the story itselfRevenant1988 1/3/12 3:15 p.m.
                 Re: Forget canon, what about the story itselfStephen L. (SoundEffect) 1/3/12 4:19 p.m.
                       Re: Forget canon, what about the story itselfFlynn J Taggart 1/4/12 12:11 a.m.
                             Re: Forget canon, what about the story itselfStephen L. (SoundEffect) 1/4/12 12:41 a.m.
                                   Re: Forget canon, what about the story itselfFlynn J Taggart 1/4/12 1:01 a.m.
                                         Re: Forget canon, what about the story itselfQuirel 1/4/12 2:35 a.m.
                                               Re: Forget canon, what about the story itselfFlynn J Taggart 1/4/12 4:39 a.m.
                 Re: Forget canon, what about the story itselfGeneral Vagueness 1/3/12 6:04 p.m.
           Re: Forget canon, what about the story itselfGeneral Vagueness 1/3/12 4:27 p.m.
                 Re: Forget canon, what about the story itselfdavidfuchs 1/3/12 8:23 p.m.
           Re: Forget canon, what about the story itselfGrimBrother IV 1/3/12 8:21 p.m.
                 Re: Forget canon, what about the story itselfdavidfuchs 1/3/12 8:25 p.m.
                       Re: Forget canon, what about the story itselfGrimBrother IV 1/3/12 8:33 p.m.
                             Re: Forget canon, what about the story itselfdavidfuchs 1/3/12 9:27 p.m.
                                   Re: Forget canon, what about the story itselfGrimBrother IV 1/3/12 9:41 p.m.
                                   Re: Forget canon, what about the story itselfuberfoop 1/3/12 9:43 p.m.
                                         Re: Forget canon, what about the story itselfBeckx 1/3/12 9:51 p.m.
                                               Re: Forget canon, what about the story itselfdavidfuchs 1/3/12 10:03 p.m.
                                   Re: Forget canon, what about the story itselfStephen L. (SoundEffect) 1/3/12 11:24 p.m.
                                         Re: Forget canon, what about the story itselfdavidfuchs 1/4/12 12:18 a.m.
                                               Re: Forget canon, what about the story itselfStephen L. (SoundEffect) 1/4/12 12:43 a.m.
                                                     Re: Forget canon, what about the story itselfGeneral Vagueness 1/5/12 3:32 a.m.
                                                           Re: Forget canon, what about the story itselfStephen L. (SoundEffect) 1/5/12 12:33 p.m.
                 Also agreed and a note on Spartan deathsFlynn J Taggart 1/4/12 12:52 a.m.
                 Re: Forget canon, what about the story itselfGeneral Vagueness 1/4/12 6:24 a.m.
           Suspension of Disbelief: Why Canon is Important.Leviathan 1/3/12 9:04 p.m.
                 Hear Heardavidfuchs 1/3/12 9:30 p.m.
                 Re: Suspension of Disbelief: Why Canon is ImportanStephen L. (SoundEffect) 1/3/12 11:20 p.m.
                       Re: Suspension of Disbelief: Why Canon is Importanuberfoop 1/4/12 12:29 a.m.
                             Re: Suspension of Disbelief: Why Canon is ImportanStephen L. (SoundEffect) 1/4/12 12:45 a.m.
                                   Re: Suspension of Disbelief: Why Canon is Importandavidfuchs 1/4/12 1:03 a.m.
                                         Re: Suspension of Disbelief: Why Canon is Importanuberfoop 1/4/12 1:23 a.m.
                                         Re: Suspension of Disbelief: Why Canon is ImportanStephen L. (SoundEffect) 1/4/12 2:16 a.m.
                                   CoincidentallyBeckx 1/4/12 11:20 p.m.
     Re: As much as I enjoyed Reach . . .Beckx 1/3/12 3:20 p.m.
           Re: As much as I enjoyed Reach . . .SonofMacPhisto 1/5/12 6:35 p.m.
     I like Reach.Postmortem 1/3/12 5:24 p.m.
           Re: I like Reach.General Vagueness 1/3/12 6:49 p.m.
           Re: I like Reach.stabbim 1/3/12 8:59 p.m.
     Just gonna leave this here:Dervish 1/4/12 12:32 a.m.
           Re: Just gonna leave this here:JDQuackers 1/5/12 4:39 p.m.
                 Re: Just gonna leave this here:Dervish 1/6/12 3:50 a.m.
                       Re: Just gonna leave this here:Stephen L. (SoundEffect) 1/6/12 3:59 a.m.
                             Re: Just gonna leave this here:JDQuackers 1/6/12 1:38 p.m.
                                   Re: Just gonna leave this here:Stephen L. (SoundEffect) 1/6/12 3:54 p.m.
                                         Hmmm I guess Glasslands *Spoilers*JDQuackers 1/6/12 4:04 p.m.
                                               I concurRevenant1988 1/6/12 4:20 p.m.
                                               Re: Hmmm I guess Glasslands *Spoilers*Stephen L. (SoundEffect) 1/6/12 4:49 p.m.
                                                     Re: Hmmm I guess Glasslands *Spoilers*JDQuackers 1/6/12 6:31 p.m.
                                                     Re: Hmmm I guess Glasslands *Spoilers*Bry 1/6/12 11:49 p.m.
                             Re: Just gonna leave this here:Dervish 1/6/12 4:39 p.m.
     Regardless of canonityC.W. Miller 1/4/12 7:04 a.m.
           Re: Regardless of canonityDEEP NNN 1/4/12 12:22 p.m.
                 Re: Regardless of canonityC.W. Miller 1/4/12 3:24 p.m.



contact us

The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33.