Frequently Asked Forum Questions | ||||
Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts | ||||
Re: Why We Should Never Go Back to 1-50.. or | |
Posted By: FyreWulff <mkidder@gmail.com> | Date: 2/27/11 10:05 a.m. |
In Response To: Re: Why We Should Never Go Back to 1-50.. or (zonemanwilf) : The Halo 3 Team Slayer ranked list has a higher population than Reach Team : Arena - right now. That is not a healthy position for Reach. Reach and 3 count population in different ways. 3 accumulates count over a lot of hours, when Reach is counting who is searching and playing at that moment. In fact, Halo 3's in-game population numbers have been broken and blatantly wrong since those servers were moved onto Reach's, like playlists totalling to twice the amount of "Total" players on the menu when you count them up. Most of the last DEXPs always read 0 population, Team Slayer was stuck at 37,539 for 3 weeks, etc.. The only accurate population count left is here: http://www.bungie.net/online/default.aspx 178,242 players over the last 24 hours for Halo 3
http://www.bungie.net/stats/reach/online.aspx 803,695 players over the last 24 hours for Reach
fake edit: and loading up Halo 3 again. Of note, the population in the lobby and the population you get while searching is still wildly different and broken. Lobby is reporting a few thousand more than actually playing.. which still indicates those servers are still broken (the numbers should be the same or within a hundred or so of each other). Going by the searching population: Lone Wolves: 2,290
7 on 7th: 425 Rumble Pit: 511
All of these numbers are more than likely going to be exactly the same when I load up Halo 3 two days from now. The only population numbers possible to compare directly to each other are the Games Over 24 Hours and Players Over 24 Hour counts on Bungie.net for Reach, 3, and ODST.
|
|
Replies: |
Why We Should Never Go Back to 1-50.. or | FyreWulff | 2/26/11 3:25 p.m. |
Re: Why We Should Never Go Back to 1-50.. or | Pkmnrulz240 | 2/26/11 3:42 p.m. |
Excellent, excellent post *NM* | mr_mcmurder | 2/26/11 4:00 p.m. |
I agree with your opinion, good sir. | snakegriffin | 2/26/11 4:10 p.m. |
Re: Why We Should Never Go Back to 1-50.. or | Hyokin | 2/26/11 4:14 p.m. |
Re: Why We Should Never Go Back to 1-50.. or | ZackDark | 2/26/11 4:15 p.m. |
Re: Why We Should Never Go Back to 1-50.. or | KalamariKidd | 2/26/11 4:46 p.m. |
I don't play Arena... | munky-058 | 2/26/11 4:54 p.m. |
Re: Why We Should Never Go Back to 1-50.. or | DEEP NNN | 2/26/11 5:00 p.m. |
Re: Why We Should Never Go Back to 1-50.. or | GrimBrother One | 2/26/11 5:05 p.m. |
Re: Why We Should Never Go Back to 1-50.. or | Louis Wu | 2/26/11 5:07 p.m. |
Re: Why We Should Never Go Back to 1-50.. or | DEEP NNN | 2/26/11 5:13 p.m. |
Re: Why We Should Never Go Back to 1-50.. or | Dani | 2/26/11 6:34 p.m. |
Re: Why We Should Never Go Back to 1-50.. or | FyreWulff | 2/26/11 6:53 p.m. |
Re: Why We Should Never Go Back to 1-50.. or | DEEP NNN | 2/26/11 7:02 p.m. |
Re: Why We Should Never Go Back to 1-50.. or | Dani | 2/26/11 9:05 p.m. |
Re: Why We Should Never Go Back to 1-50.. or | bluerunner | 2/26/11 7:36 p.m. |
Ranks | dogcom | 2/26/11 7:53 p.m. |
Re: Ranks | DEEP NNN | 2/26/11 8:05 p.m. |
Re: Ranks | FyreWulff | 2/26/11 8:08 p.m. |
Re: Why We Should Never Go Back to 1-50.. or | DEEP NNN | 2/26/11 5:09 p.m. |
Re: Why We Should Never Go Back to 1-50.. or | vlad3163 | 2/26/11 10:10 p.m. |
But CR = Idlers Paradise | sharpsniper99 | 2/26/11 6:41 p.m. |
Re: But CR = Idlers Paradise | FyreWulff | 2/26/11 7:05 p.m. |
Re: But CR = Idlers Paradise | FyreWulff | 2/26/11 7:15 p.m. |
Re: But CR = Idlers Paradise | sharpsniper99 | 2/27/11 4:34 a.m. |
Re: But CR = Idlers Paradise | sharpsniper99 | 2/27/11 5:04 a.m. |
PS. Fyrefulff, Gr1m? | munky-058 | 2/26/11 6:46 p.m. |
Re: PS. Fyrefulff, Gr1m? | FyreWulff | 2/26/11 7:45 p.m. |
Fyrefluff? That's OUSTANDING! | munky-058 | 2/26/11 8:02 p.m. |
Nice | dogcom | 2/26/11 7:57 p.m. |
I actually read the whole thing. *NM* | SonGoharotto | 2/26/11 8:11 p.m. |
Bleep Bloop *NM* | FyreWulff | 2/26/11 8:12 p.m. |
Sup Devin Olsen | FyreWulff | 2/26/11 8:12 p.m. |
Re: Sup Devin Olsen | Devin Olsen | 2/26/11 8:37 p.m. |
Re: Sup Devin Olsen | FyreWulff | 2/26/11 8:47 p.m. |
Re: Sup Devin Olsen | SonGoharotto | 2/26/11 9:04 p.m. |
Re: Sup Devin Olsen | ArteenEsben | 2/26/11 9:33 p.m. |
Re: Sup Devin Olsen | Devin Olsen | 2/26/11 9:52 p.m. |
Re: Sup Devin Olsen | munky-058 | 2/26/11 10:09 p.m. |
Re: Sup Devin Olsen | SonGoharotto | 2/27/11 8:31 a.m. |
Re: Sup Devin Olsen | General Vagueness | 2/26/11 10:52 p.m. |
Re: Sup Devin Olsen | Hawaiian Pig | 2/27/11 4:33 p.m. |
Re: Sup Devin Olsen | Hawaiian Pig | 2/27/11 4:37 p.m. |
Re: Sup Devin Olsen | General Vagueness | 2/27/11 5:52 p.m. |
Re: Sup Devin Olsen | BlueNinja | 2/27/11 5:56 a.m. |
Nice post. | Gravemind | 2/27/11 2:44 a.m. |
Re: Nice post. | DEEP NNN | 2/27/11 8:20 a.m. |
Re: Nice post. | BlueNinja | 2/27/11 9:49 a.m. |
Re: Nice post. | FyreWulff | 2/27/11 10:07 a.m. |
Re: Nice post. | BlueNinja | 2/27/11 12:00 p.m. |
Re: Nice post. | Gravemind | 2/27/11 12:32 p.m. |
Re: Nice post. | FyreWulff | 2/27/11 9:38 a.m. |
if you flag hold on my team | kidtsunami | 2/27/11 3:37 p.m. |
Re: if you flag hold on my team | FyreWulff | 2/27/11 4:15 p.m. |
^ I have the same mindset as you two. | NsU Soldier | 2/27/11 7:33 p.m. |
Re: Why We Should Never Go Back to 1-50.. or | Zogen | 2/27/11 4:29 a.m. |
Re: Why We Should Never Go Back to 1-50.. or | zonemanwilf | 2/27/11 4:42 a.m. |
Re: Why We Should Never Go Back to 1-50.. or | DEEP NNN | 2/27/11 9:07 a.m. |
Re: Why We Should Never Go Back to 1-50.. or | FyreWulff | 2/27/11 10:05 a.m. |
Re: Why We Should Never Go Back to 1-50.. or | KalamariKidd | 2/27/11 10:17 a.m. |
Some notes.... | RC Master | 2/27/11 11:09 a.m. |
Re: Some notes.... | FyreWulff | 2/27/11 11:47 a.m. |
Re: Some notes.... | RC Master | 2/28/11 9:28 a.m. |
Re: Some notes.... | FyreWulff | 2/28/11 10:01 a.m. |
Wholeheartedly agree *NM* | kidtsunami | 2/28/11 12:05 a.m. |
The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33. |