Frequently Asked Forum Questions | ||||
Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts | ||||
Re: Why We Should Never Go Back to 1-50.. or | |
Posted By: DEEP NNN <deep_nnn@hotmail.com> | Date: 2/27/11 9:07 a.m. |
In Response To: Re: Why We Should Never Go Back to 1-50.. or (zonemanwilf) : All well and good, I tend to agree with the principles of 90% of what you : write. : However, the Arena ranking system has been rejected by the community. Just
: It has failed. I hope the incoming changes will reverse this situation, but I
: The Halo 3 Team Slayer ranked list has a higher population than Reach Team
: This reason for this lack of population in my eyes is to do with the seasons.
: Personally I would do away with seasons altogether and intruduce an
: Something needs doing, because Reach's only ranked playlist should be canned
: In summary, whilst in theory the Arena ranking system makes sense above the
What is your measure of a failure? What numbers does it take to succeed? If you look at the number of players "currently playing" in each list it would give reference. If your measure of a failure for ARENA are its numbers then wouldn't similar numbers indicate a failure for other playlists? I think you must be incorrect because otherwise Firefight Unlimited, MLG, Team Objective, Score Attack, Co-op Campaign and Noble Map Pack are also failures. I do not see those playlists as failures but rather as alternatives to go to. A playlist like ARENA only needs enough players to make it function. Nothing more. Has the overall REACH population suffered for people leaving the game because ARENA wasn't good enough for them to stay? I don't know. Where are the numbers for that? Without them there is no way of knowing. These numbers were collected around 10 Eastern I might be off on the time a bit.
|
|
Replies: |
Why We Should Never Go Back to 1-50.. or | FyreWulff | 2/26/11 3:25 p.m. |
Re: Why We Should Never Go Back to 1-50.. or | Pkmnrulz240 | 2/26/11 3:42 p.m. |
Excellent, excellent post *NM* | mr_mcmurder | 2/26/11 4:00 p.m. |
I agree with your opinion, good sir. | snakegriffin | 2/26/11 4:10 p.m. |
Re: Why We Should Never Go Back to 1-50.. or | Hyokin | 2/26/11 4:14 p.m. |
Re: Why We Should Never Go Back to 1-50.. or | ZackDark | 2/26/11 4:15 p.m. |
Re: Why We Should Never Go Back to 1-50.. or | KalamariKidd | 2/26/11 4:46 p.m. |
I don't play Arena... | munky-058 | 2/26/11 4:54 p.m. |
Re: Why We Should Never Go Back to 1-50.. or | DEEP NNN | 2/26/11 5:00 p.m. |
Re: Why We Should Never Go Back to 1-50.. or | GrimBrother One | 2/26/11 5:05 p.m. |
Re: Why We Should Never Go Back to 1-50.. or | Louis Wu | 2/26/11 5:07 p.m. |
Re: Why We Should Never Go Back to 1-50.. or | DEEP NNN | 2/26/11 5:13 p.m. |
Re: Why We Should Never Go Back to 1-50.. or | Dani | 2/26/11 6:34 p.m. |
Re: Why We Should Never Go Back to 1-50.. or | FyreWulff | 2/26/11 6:53 p.m. |
Re: Why We Should Never Go Back to 1-50.. or | DEEP NNN | 2/26/11 7:02 p.m. |
Re: Why We Should Never Go Back to 1-50.. or | Dani | 2/26/11 9:05 p.m. |
Re: Why We Should Never Go Back to 1-50.. or | bluerunner | 2/26/11 7:36 p.m. |
Ranks | dogcom | 2/26/11 7:53 p.m. |
Re: Ranks | DEEP NNN | 2/26/11 8:05 p.m. |
Re: Ranks | FyreWulff | 2/26/11 8:08 p.m. |
Re: Why We Should Never Go Back to 1-50.. or | DEEP NNN | 2/26/11 5:09 p.m. |
Re: Why We Should Never Go Back to 1-50.. or | vlad3163 | 2/26/11 10:10 p.m. |
But CR = Idlers Paradise | sharpsniper99 | 2/26/11 6:41 p.m. |
Re: But CR = Idlers Paradise | FyreWulff | 2/26/11 7:05 p.m. |
Re: But CR = Idlers Paradise | FyreWulff | 2/26/11 7:15 p.m. |
Re: But CR = Idlers Paradise | sharpsniper99 | 2/27/11 4:34 a.m. |
Re: But CR = Idlers Paradise | sharpsniper99 | 2/27/11 5:04 a.m. |
PS. Fyrefulff, Gr1m? | munky-058 | 2/26/11 6:46 p.m. |
Re: PS. Fyrefulff, Gr1m? | FyreWulff | 2/26/11 7:45 p.m. |
Fyrefluff? That's OUSTANDING! | munky-058 | 2/26/11 8:02 p.m. |
Nice | dogcom | 2/26/11 7:57 p.m. |
I actually read the whole thing. *NM* | SonGoharotto | 2/26/11 8:11 p.m. |
Bleep Bloop *NM* | FyreWulff | 2/26/11 8:12 p.m. |
Sup Devin Olsen | FyreWulff | 2/26/11 8:12 p.m. |
Re: Sup Devin Olsen | Devin Olsen | 2/26/11 8:37 p.m. |
Re: Sup Devin Olsen | FyreWulff | 2/26/11 8:47 p.m. |
Re: Sup Devin Olsen | SonGoharotto | 2/26/11 9:04 p.m. |
Re: Sup Devin Olsen | ArteenEsben | 2/26/11 9:33 p.m. |
Re: Sup Devin Olsen | Devin Olsen | 2/26/11 9:52 p.m. |
Re: Sup Devin Olsen | munky-058 | 2/26/11 10:09 p.m. |
Re: Sup Devin Olsen | SonGoharotto | 2/27/11 8:31 a.m. |
Re: Sup Devin Olsen | General Vagueness | 2/26/11 10:52 p.m. |
Re: Sup Devin Olsen | Hawaiian Pig | 2/27/11 4:33 p.m. |
Re: Sup Devin Olsen | Hawaiian Pig | 2/27/11 4:37 p.m. |
Re: Sup Devin Olsen | General Vagueness | 2/27/11 5:52 p.m. |
Re: Sup Devin Olsen | BlueNinja | 2/27/11 5:56 a.m. |
Nice post. | Gravemind | 2/27/11 2:44 a.m. |
Re: Nice post. | DEEP NNN | 2/27/11 8:20 a.m. |
Re: Nice post. | BlueNinja | 2/27/11 9:49 a.m. |
Re: Nice post. | FyreWulff | 2/27/11 10:07 a.m. |
Re: Nice post. | BlueNinja | 2/27/11 12:00 p.m. |
Re: Nice post. | Gravemind | 2/27/11 12:32 p.m. |
Re: Nice post. | FyreWulff | 2/27/11 9:38 a.m. |
if you flag hold on my team | kidtsunami | 2/27/11 3:37 p.m. |
Re: if you flag hold on my team | FyreWulff | 2/27/11 4:15 p.m. |
^ I have the same mindset as you two. | NsU Soldier | 2/27/11 7:33 p.m. |
Re: Why We Should Never Go Back to 1-50.. or | Zogen | 2/27/11 4:29 a.m. |
Re: Why We Should Never Go Back to 1-50.. or | zonemanwilf | 2/27/11 4:42 a.m. |
Re: Why We Should Never Go Back to 1-50.. or | DEEP NNN | 2/27/11 9:07 a.m. |
Re: Why We Should Never Go Back to 1-50.. or | FyreWulff | 2/27/11 10:05 a.m. |
Re: Why We Should Never Go Back to 1-50.. or | KalamariKidd | 2/27/11 10:17 a.m. |
Some notes.... | RC Master | 2/27/11 11:09 a.m. |
Re: Some notes.... | FyreWulff | 2/27/11 11:47 a.m. |
Re: Some notes.... | RC Master | 2/28/11 9:28 a.m. |
Re: Some notes.... | FyreWulff | 2/28/11 10:01 a.m. |
Wholeheartedly agree *NM* | kidtsunami | 2/28/11 12:05 a.m. |
The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33. |