Frequently Asked Forum Questions
Search the HBO News Archives Any All Exact		Search the Halo Updates DBs Halo Halo2		Bungie Webcam HBO XBL Gamertags *Ar's Simple HTML Guide Shishka's Guide for Newcomers The Lowdown on Download Accelerators Red Loser's Anti-Spamming Guide Egg FAQ | More Egg Stuff c0ld's Movie Starter Guide Shishka's HaloPC Pre-Release FAQ 3.1 AutoMagic 117 StripzMaker
Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts

Re: Here's how I responded
Posted By: 1138	Date: 8/30/05 9:29 a.m.
In Response To: Re: Here's how I responded (jazo) : You have very very strong points and I agree with you. However what I hate is : that my Halo 1 disc that I love sits and collects dust unless my friends : and I decide to bust it out for fun at the occasional lan. I can't just : get my Halo 1 fix at any time like I could with Halo 2 if I so desired. I : know Halo PC is there, but my computer power combined with my shoddy DSL : makes that a bad experience. I can't hop on XBC because no one is ever on : there either. : Halo 2 has the Live treatment and it deserves it. However while doing this it : pretty much killed Halo 1. I guess that is why I still cannot move on and : appreciate Halo 2 to its fullest. Yet another example of how people wanted Halo 2 to be Halo 1.5. I agree with mercury saying that it would've taken more criticism if it were Halo: Rehased. Think about it: If the Empire Strikes Back were a rehash of Star Wars, would it have the same effect as the first one did? It would just be a second one. In fact, the writter for ESB even said on the Star Wars documentary Empire of Dreams, that he was glad it wasn't a rehash of Star Wars. The second act is the bridge that connects the first and third one and because it's a bridge it may get a lot of flak for being one.

Message Index

New post at my blog The Oracle	mercury	8/29/05 1:29 p.m.
Re: New post at my blog The Oracle	Zattack89	8/29/05 2:05 p.m.
Re: New post at my blog The Oracle	1138	8/29/05 2:13 p.m.
Re: New post at my blog The Oracle	zink	8/29/05 2:59 p.m.
Bungie needs to cater to both sides.	JakeDaGreat	8/29/05 3:35 p.m.
Re: Bungie needs to cater to both sides.	mercury	8/29/05 3:52 p.m.
Re: Bungie needs to cater to both sides.	JakeDaGreat	8/29/05 5:08 p.m.
Re: Bungie needs to cater to both sides.	charthepirate	8/29/05 5:42 p.m.
Re: Bungie needs to cater to both sides.	JakeDaGreat	8/29/05 5:59 p.m.
Re: Bungie needs to cater to both sides.	charthepirate	8/29/05 6:36 p.m.
Re: Bungie needs to cater to both sides.	JakeDaGreat	8/29/05 6:51 p.m.
Re: Bungie needs to cater to both sides.	mercury	8/29/05 7:30 p.m.
Re: Bungie needs to cater to both sides.	JakeDaGreat	8/29/05 8:10 p.m.
Re: Bungie needs to cater to both sides.	charthepirate	8/29/05 7:31 p.m.
Re: Bungie needs to cater to both sides.	Louis Wu	8/30/05 9:02 a.m.
Re: Bungie needs to cater to both sides.	JakeDaGreat	8/30/05 5:38 p.m.
Re: Bungie needs to cater to both sides.	Louis Wu	8/30/05 9:26 p.m.
Re: Bungie needs to cater to both sides.	Sir Viking	8/29/05 10:06 p.m.
Re: Bungie needs to cater to both sides.	Scarab	8/30/05 11:08 a.m.
Re: Bungie needs to cater to both sides.	Sir Viking	8/30/05 7:15 p.m.
Alert: I'm about to make an unfair analogy	Pizack	8/29/05 4:43 p.m.
Re: New post at my blog The Oracle	jazo	8/29/05 5:20 p.m.
Re: New post at my blog The Oracle	charthepirate	8/29/05 5:37 p.m.
Here's how I responded	mercury	8/29/05 7:48 p.m.
Re: Here's how I responded	jazo	8/30/05 3:11 a.m.
Re: Here's how I responded	1138	8/30/05 9:29 a.m.