glyphstrip FAQ button
Halo.bungie.org
glyphstrip
Frequently Asked Forum Questions
 Search the HBO News Archives

Any All Exact 
Search the Halo Updates DBs

Halo Halo2 
Search Older Posts on This Forum:
Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts


Re: bwhahahahahahaha
Posted By: selmack <selmack20@yahoo.com>Date: 2/21/05 10:39 p.m.

In Response To: Re: bwhahahahahahaha (mrbananas)

: the guilty spark response was just an addon, the lack of making any sense
: comes from the part when the forerunner go to great lenghts to ensure the
: surival of the flood when it is the reason why they had to kill themselves
: and every one else. if the forerunner whated the flood alive then we kill
: themselves to stop it. like i said makes no sense.

I believe you answered your own question with your statement below, the reason the flood was kept alive was so that they could be studied, I mean they would half to come from somewhere and if they came into existence then they must be able to survive on that homeworld and of course they would go into hibernation until somthing came along that they could eat. Then of course what makes no sense is killing everyone in the galaxy to just put the flood into hibernation, since even if some sort of actions were taken to bring back life then the flood would awake then continue their rampage as soon as suitable hosts evolved on the worlds that they were on but at that point the species would not be advanced enough to make the trip to a halo or probably even know of them(or if life was only seeded on non-infected worlds and those species did discover space flight they may not know that they were supposed to activate the halos when the flood got released IE the Covenant)

: and as for what you said about guilty spark. he just be doing his job. the
: rings were meant to study the flood after the forerunner were gone so that
: a better solution could be found toward stopping the flood. guilty spark
: is merely informing the chief on what has been study and what they have
: learned, maybe its part of his job to give out information on the flood to
: the reclaimer.


Message Index




Replies:

The Ark as the "device" from I Love BeesMr. Munchy 2/21/05 5:20 a.m.
     Re: The Ark as the "device" from I Love Beesaltodarknight 2/21/05 6:06 a.m.
           Re: The Ark as the "device" from I Love BeesSep7imus [subnova] 2/21/05 6:45 a.m.
                 Re: The Ark as the "device" from I Love Beespmzukan 2/21/05 7:21 a.m.
                       Re: The Ark as the "device" from I Love BeesSep7imus [subnova] 2/21/05 7:56 a.m.
                             Re: The Ark as the "device" from I Love BeesMr. Mister 2/21/05 10:10 a.m.
                                   Re: The Ark as the "device" from I Love Beesgspawn 2/21/05 11:06 a.m.
                                         Re: The Ark as the "device" from I Love Beesselmack 2/21/05 11:48 a.m.
                                               Re: The Ark as the "device" from I Love Beesgspawn 2/21/05 2:13 p.m.
                                                     Re: The Ark as the "device" from I Love Beesselmack 2/21/05 3:20 p.m.
                                   Re: The Ark as the "device" from I Love BeesHikaru-119 2/21/05 12:17 p.m.
                             Re: The Ark as the "device" from I Love BeesMasta Shake 2/21/05 11:01 a.m.
                                   Re: The Ark as the "device" from I Love BeesSep7imus [subnova] 2/21/05 11:06 a.m.
                                         Re: The Ark as the "device" from I Love BeesMasta Shake 2/21/05 11:14 a.m.
                                         Re: The Ark as the "device" from I Love BeesDundre 2/25/05 10:06 p.m.
           Re: The Ark as the "device" from I Love Beesubersaurus 2/21/05 3:32 p.m.
                 Re: The Ark as the "device" from I Love BeesDundre 2/25/05 10:30 p.m.
     Re: The Ark as the "device" from I Love BeesDr.Strangelove 2/21/05 9:14 a.m.
     I thought the Ark was earth.... *NM*New Guy 2/21/05 10:49 a.m.
           Re: I thought the Ark was earth....gspawn 2/21/05 11:07 a.m.
                 In Bungie terms...Section IV (MetalSilver) 2/21/05 1:28 p.m.
                       GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<58 2/21/05 4:45 p.m.
                             GAH! your proof is not very goodmrbananas 2/21/05 6:13 p.m.
                             'GAH!' Yes we areSection IV (MetalSilver) 2/21/05 6:15 p.m.
                                   Re: 'GAH!' Yes we areselmack 2/21/05 7:45 p.m.
                                         'GAH' stop saying 'GAH'Section IV (MetalSilver) 2/22/05 5:28 p.m.
                                               Re: 'GAH' stop saying 'GAH'selmack 2/22/05 6:23 p.m.
                                                     Suicidal Covenant, like in the Two TowersSeries III (MetalSilver) 2/22/05 6:48 p.m.
                                                           Re: Suicidal Covenant, like in the Two Towersselmack 2/22/05 7:29 p.m.
                             Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<Paladin-117 2/21/05 6:22 p.m.
                                   Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<58 2/21/05 6:26 p.m.
                                         Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<mrbananas 2/21/05 6:47 p.m.
                                               Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<58 2/21/05 6:59 p.m.
                                                     Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<Stephen (SoundEffect) 2/21/05 7:39 p.m.
                                                           Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<58 2/21/05 7:54 p.m.
                                                                 bwhahahahahahahamrbananas 2/21/05 9:52 p.m.
                                                                       Re: bwhahahahahahahaselmack 2/21/05 10:06 p.m.
                                                                             Re: bwhahahahahahahamrbananas 2/21/05 10:16 p.m.
                                                                                   Re: bwhahahahahahahaselmack 2/21/05 10:39 p.m.
                                                                                         Re: bwhahahahahahahamrbananas 2/22/05 9:18 a.m.
                                                                       my trap seems to have worked perfectly *NM*mrbananas 2/22/05 10:11 p.m.
                                                     Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<mrbananas 2/21/05 10:08 p.m.
                                         Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<selmack 2/21/05 7:49 p.m.
                                               Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<58 2/21/05 7:56 p.m.
                                                     Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<selmack 2/21/05 8:04 p.m.
                                                           Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<58 2/21/05 8:12 p.m.
                                                                 Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<selmack 2/21/05 8:18 p.m.
                                                                       Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<mrbananas 2/21/05 9:57 p.m.
                                                                             Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<selmack 2/21/05 10:08 p.m.
                                                                                   Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<58 2/22/05 7:00 a.m.
                                                                                         Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<selmack 2/22/05 8:49 a.m.
                                                                                         Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<mrbananas 2/22/05 9:01 a.m.
                                                                                               Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<Stephen (SoundEffect) 2/22/05 10:49 a.m.
                                                                                                     Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<58 2/22/05 5:13 p.m.
                                                                                                           Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<mrbananas 2/22/05 10:08 p.m.
                                                                                                                 Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<selmack 2/23/05 8:12 a.m.
                                                                                                                       Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<mrbananas 2/23/05 11:24 a.m.
                                                                                                                             Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<selmack 2/23/05 5:58 p.m.
                                                                                         Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<replay 2/22/05 1:35 p.m.
                                                                                               Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<mrbananas 2/22/05 1:50 p.m.
                                                                                                     WHOA!New Guy 2/25/05 11:12 p.m.
                                                                                                           Delete this pleaseNew Guy 2/25/05 11:13 p.m.
                                                                                                                 NEvermindNew Guy 2/25/05 11:16 p.m.
                                                                                                                       Re: NEvermindVirus_232 2/25/05 11:20 p.m.
                                                                                                                             Re: NEvermindNew Guy 2/25/05 11:24 p.m.
                                                                                                                                   Re: NEvermindVirus_232 2/25/05 11:33 p.m.
                                                                                                                                   Re: NEvermindHawk7886 2/26/05 6:13 a.m.
     Are there actual dates in 2552 given in ILB?replay 2/22/05 1:01 a.m.
           Re: Are there actual dates in 2552 given in ILB?selmack 2/22/05 6:30 p.m.
     Or something else?Sly_Avatar 2/25/05 6:48 p.m.
           Re: Or something else?Hikaru-119 2/25/05 6:54 p.m.
                 Ark in splinter Cell?!H3WH01SNT 2/25/05 7:32 p.m.
                       Re: Ark in splinter Cell?!Hawaiian Pig 2/25/05 7:39 p.m.
                             Halo came before SC....Virus_232 2/25/05 8:18 p.m.
                                   Re: Halo came before SC....arclight 2/25/05 8:28 p.m.
                                         I am an 800 pound gorilla! *NM*H3WH01SNT 2/25/05 8:32 p.m.
                                               Re: I am an 800 pound gorilla!Zado Zudamee 2/25/05 9:06 p.m.
                                                     Re: I am an 800 pound gorilla!Virus_232 2/25/05 10:55 p.m.
                       Re: Ark in splinter Cell?!Dundre 2/25/05 11:58 p.m.



contact us

The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33.