glyphstrip FAQ button
Halo.bungie.org
glyphstrip
Frequently Asked Forum Questions
 Search the HBO News Archives

Any All Exact 
Search the Halo Updates DBs

Halo Halo2 
Search Older Posts on This Forum:
Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts


Re: bwhahahahahahaha
Posted By: mrbananas <dgreenwood@lacademy.edu>Date: 2/21/05 10:16 p.m.

In Response To: Re: bwhahahahahahaha (selmack)

: I beg to differ that the first dosent make sense, Guilty Spark does seem to
: want the flood dead but he also is quite facinated by them and as the
: inquisitive little guy he is he would want to find out more about them,
: well you can only find out so much reviewing compiled data, so he is
: pleased that he can now study the flood in a real world simulation:
: "...Its parasitic nature belies the Flood's intelligence."
: "Of course, samples were kept here after the last catastrophic
: outbreak...for study."(that pause makes me a little wary, he may have
: been the one who stored them there for "study" or that may not
: be the Forerunner's real reason, but that is just rampant speculation)
: "You can see how the body's been transformed by the genetic
: restructuring of the Flood infection. The small creatures carry spores
: that cause a host to mutate. The mutated host then produces spores that
: can pass the Flood to others. It is insidious and elegant. As long as any
: hosts remain, the Flood is virulent."
: As you can see GS is quite interested in the flood, being almost enamored by
: them in a way, secondly, the sentence structure in the statment you base
: your argument on would mean that he is talking about the flood(he never
: mentions another subject so the meaning of the sentence did not change)and
: given GS's nature of sticking to procedure and the fact that he is a
: Forerunner made AI it would be assumed that he would not butcher the
: english language in such a way as to make his sentence have the meaning
: that you attribute to it.

the guilty spark response was just an addon, the lack of making any sense comes from the part when the forerunner go to great lenghts to ensure the surival of the flood when it is the reason why they had to kill themselves and every one else. if the forerunner whated the flood alive then we kill themselves to stop it. like i said makes no sense.

and as for what you said about guilty spark. he just be doing his job. the rings were meant to study the flood after the forerunner were gone so that a better solution could be found toward stopping the flood. guilty spark is merely informing the chief on what has been study and what they have learned, maybe its part of his job to give out information on the flood to the reclaimer.


Message Index




Replies:

The Ark as the "device" from I Love BeesMr. Munchy 2/21/05 5:20 a.m.
     Re: The Ark as the "device" from I Love Beesaltodarknight 2/21/05 6:06 a.m.
           Re: The Ark as the "device" from I Love BeesSep7imus [subnova] 2/21/05 6:45 a.m.
                 Re: The Ark as the "device" from I Love Beespmzukan 2/21/05 7:21 a.m.
                       Re: The Ark as the "device" from I Love BeesSep7imus [subnova] 2/21/05 7:56 a.m.
                             Re: The Ark as the "device" from I Love BeesMr. Mister 2/21/05 10:10 a.m.
                                   Re: The Ark as the "device" from I Love Beesgspawn 2/21/05 11:06 a.m.
                                         Re: The Ark as the "device" from I Love Beesselmack 2/21/05 11:48 a.m.
                                               Re: The Ark as the "device" from I Love Beesgspawn 2/21/05 2:13 p.m.
                                                     Re: The Ark as the "device" from I Love Beesselmack 2/21/05 3:20 p.m.
                                   Re: The Ark as the "device" from I Love BeesHikaru-119 2/21/05 12:17 p.m.
                             Re: The Ark as the "device" from I Love BeesMasta Shake 2/21/05 11:01 a.m.
                                   Re: The Ark as the "device" from I Love BeesSep7imus [subnova] 2/21/05 11:06 a.m.
                                         Re: The Ark as the "device" from I Love BeesMasta Shake 2/21/05 11:14 a.m.
                                         Re: The Ark as the "device" from I Love BeesDundre 2/25/05 10:06 p.m.
           Re: The Ark as the "device" from I Love Beesubersaurus 2/21/05 3:32 p.m.
                 Re: The Ark as the "device" from I Love BeesDundre 2/25/05 10:30 p.m.
     Re: The Ark as the "device" from I Love BeesDr.Strangelove 2/21/05 9:14 a.m.
     I thought the Ark was earth.... *NM*New Guy 2/21/05 10:49 a.m.
           Re: I thought the Ark was earth....gspawn 2/21/05 11:07 a.m.
                 In Bungie terms...Section IV (MetalSilver) 2/21/05 1:28 p.m.
                       GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<58 2/21/05 4:45 p.m.
                             GAH! your proof is not very goodmrbananas 2/21/05 6:13 p.m.
                             'GAH!' Yes we areSection IV (MetalSilver) 2/21/05 6:15 p.m.
                                   Re: 'GAH!' Yes we areselmack 2/21/05 7:45 p.m.
                                         'GAH' stop saying 'GAH'Section IV (MetalSilver) 2/22/05 5:28 p.m.
                                               Re: 'GAH' stop saying 'GAH'selmack 2/22/05 6:23 p.m.
                                                     Suicidal Covenant, like in the Two TowersSeries III (MetalSilver) 2/22/05 6:48 p.m.
                                                           Re: Suicidal Covenant, like in the Two Towersselmack 2/22/05 7:29 p.m.
                             Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<Paladin-117 2/21/05 6:22 p.m.
                                   Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<58 2/21/05 6:26 p.m.
                                         Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<mrbananas 2/21/05 6:47 p.m.
                                               Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<58 2/21/05 6:59 p.m.
                                                     Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<Stephen (SoundEffect) 2/21/05 7:39 p.m.
                                                           Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<58 2/21/05 7:54 p.m.
                                                                 bwhahahahahahahamrbananas 2/21/05 9:52 p.m.
                                                                       Re: bwhahahahahahahaselmack 2/21/05 10:06 p.m.
                                                                             Re: bwhahahahahahahamrbananas 2/21/05 10:16 p.m.
                                                                                   Re: bwhahahahahahahaselmack 2/21/05 10:39 p.m.
                                                                                         Re: bwhahahahahahahamrbananas 2/22/05 9:18 a.m.
                                                                       my trap seems to have worked perfectly *NM*mrbananas 2/22/05 10:11 p.m.
                                                     Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<mrbananas 2/21/05 10:08 p.m.
                                         Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<selmack 2/21/05 7:49 p.m.
                                               Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<58 2/21/05 7:56 p.m.
                                                     Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<selmack 2/21/05 8:04 p.m.
                                                           Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<58 2/21/05 8:12 p.m.
                                                                 Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<selmack 2/21/05 8:18 p.m.
                                                                       Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<mrbananas 2/21/05 9:57 p.m.
                                                                             Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<selmack 2/21/05 10:08 p.m.
                                                                                   Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<58 2/22/05 7:00 a.m.
                                                                                         Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<selmack 2/22/05 8:49 a.m.
                                                                                         Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<mrbananas 2/22/05 9:01 a.m.
                                                                                               Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<Stephen (SoundEffect) 2/22/05 10:49 a.m.
                                                                                                     Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<58 2/22/05 5:13 p.m.
                                                                                                           Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<mrbananas 2/22/05 10:08 p.m.
                                                                                                                 Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<selmack 2/23/05 8:12 a.m.
                                                                                                                       Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<mrbananas 2/23/05 11:24 a.m.
                                                                                                                             Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<selmack 2/23/05 5:58 p.m.
                                                                                         Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<replay 2/22/05 1:35 p.m.
                                                                                               Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<mrbananas 2/22/05 1:50 p.m.
                                                                                                     WHOA!New Guy 2/25/05 11:12 p.m.
                                                                                                           Delete this pleaseNew Guy 2/25/05 11:13 p.m.
                                                                                                                 NEvermindNew Guy 2/25/05 11:16 p.m.
                                                                                                                       Re: NEvermindVirus_232 2/25/05 11:20 p.m.
                                                                                                                             Re: NEvermindNew Guy 2/25/05 11:24 p.m.
                                                                                                                                   Re: NEvermindVirus_232 2/25/05 11:33 p.m.
                                                                                                                                   Re: NEvermindHawk7886 2/26/05 6:13 a.m.
     Are there actual dates in 2552 given in ILB?replay 2/22/05 1:01 a.m.
           Re: Are there actual dates in 2552 given in ILB?selmack 2/22/05 6:30 p.m.
     Or something else?Sly_Avatar 2/25/05 6:48 p.m.
           Re: Or something else?Hikaru-119 2/25/05 6:54 p.m.
                 Ark in splinter Cell?!H3WH01SNT 2/25/05 7:32 p.m.
                       Re: Ark in splinter Cell?!Hawaiian Pig 2/25/05 7:39 p.m.
                             Halo came before SC....Virus_232 2/25/05 8:18 p.m.
                                   Re: Halo came before SC....arclight 2/25/05 8:28 p.m.
                                         I am an 800 pound gorilla! *NM*H3WH01SNT 2/25/05 8:32 p.m.
                                               Re: I am an 800 pound gorilla!Zado Zudamee 2/25/05 9:06 p.m.
                                                     Re: I am an 800 pound gorilla!Virus_232 2/25/05 10:55 p.m.
                       Re: Ark in splinter Cell?!Dundre 2/25/05 11:58 p.m.



contact us

The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33.