glyphstrip FAQ button
Halo.bungie.org
glyphstrip
Frequently Asked Forum Questions
 Search the HBO News Archives

Any All Exact 
Search the Halo Updates DBs

Halo Halo2 
Search Older Posts on This Forum:
Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts


GAH! your proof is not very good
Posted By: mrbananas <dgreenwood@lacademy.edu>Date: 2/21/05 6:13 p.m.

In Response To: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.< (58)

: We're "Reclaimers". Cortana got the name of Forerunner from Halo's
: primary computer. Three-four-three Guilty Spark calls us Reclaimer, not
: Forerunner, and he is in direct contact with all of Halo's computers at
: all times. That *should* disprove any "human=forerunner"
: theories out there. If it doesn't, then by all means, fire away. :)

i already disproved this one, and i will do it again.

there are two possibleitys.

1) when is the last time you have ever heard someone tyoe something up in a computer in the third person. we you type up a paper, if you want to refer to everyone, do you ever say humans found the secert to life, no. you would say "we" found the secert to life. when cortana reads the files in the control room, she would probiliy replace every pronoun she comes across with the direct noun forerunner,

2) reclaimer may be the term for the new dawn of the forerunners, do we still call the people who lived in the thirteen orignal colonies british, no! they are americans. After the activation of the rings, the next generation of forerunner were probiliy called reclaimers cause they would have to reclaim everything that the flood had robbed from us.

in the end, the fact that forerunner and reclaimer could be refured to seperatly doesn't prove that they can be the same thing, we just do have an understanding of why it is so, maybe guilty spark is trying to be politicaly corret, just like how we don't call african americans by the term of blacks anymore. (i no people still use the term black but it is not the politcally correct term.


Message Index




Replies:

The Ark as the "device" from I Love BeesMr. Munchy 2/21/05 5:20 a.m.
     Re: The Ark as the "device" from I Love Beesaltodarknight 2/21/05 6:06 a.m.
           Re: The Ark as the "device" from I Love BeesSep7imus [subnova] 2/21/05 6:45 a.m.
                 Re: The Ark as the "device" from I Love Beespmzukan 2/21/05 7:21 a.m.
                       Re: The Ark as the "device" from I Love BeesSep7imus [subnova] 2/21/05 7:56 a.m.
                             Re: The Ark as the "device" from I Love BeesMr. Mister 2/21/05 10:10 a.m.
                                   Re: The Ark as the "device" from I Love Beesgspawn 2/21/05 11:06 a.m.
                                         Re: The Ark as the "device" from I Love Beesselmack 2/21/05 11:48 a.m.
                                               Re: The Ark as the "device" from I Love Beesgspawn 2/21/05 2:13 p.m.
                                                     Re: The Ark as the "device" from I Love Beesselmack 2/21/05 3:20 p.m.
                                   Re: The Ark as the "device" from I Love BeesHikaru-119 2/21/05 12:17 p.m.
                             Re: The Ark as the "device" from I Love BeesMasta Shake 2/21/05 11:01 a.m.
                                   Re: The Ark as the "device" from I Love BeesSep7imus [subnova] 2/21/05 11:06 a.m.
                                         Re: The Ark as the "device" from I Love BeesMasta Shake 2/21/05 11:14 a.m.
                                         Re: The Ark as the "device" from I Love BeesDundre 2/25/05 10:06 p.m.
           Re: The Ark as the "device" from I Love Beesubersaurus 2/21/05 3:32 p.m.
                 Re: The Ark as the "device" from I Love BeesDundre 2/25/05 10:30 p.m.
     Re: The Ark as the "device" from I Love BeesDr.Strangelove 2/21/05 9:14 a.m.
     I thought the Ark was earth.... *NM*New Guy 2/21/05 10:49 a.m.
           Re: I thought the Ark was earth....gspawn 2/21/05 11:07 a.m.
                 In Bungie terms...Section IV (MetalSilver) 2/21/05 1:28 p.m.
                       GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<58 2/21/05 4:45 p.m.
                             GAH! your proof is not very goodmrbananas 2/21/05 6:13 p.m.
                             'GAH!' Yes we areSection IV (MetalSilver) 2/21/05 6:15 p.m.
                                   Re: 'GAH!' Yes we areselmack 2/21/05 7:45 p.m.
                                         'GAH' stop saying 'GAH'Section IV (MetalSilver) 2/22/05 5:28 p.m.
                                               Re: 'GAH' stop saying 'GAH'selmack 2/22/05 6:23 p.m.
                                                     Suicidal Covenant, like in the Two TowersSeries III (MetalSilver) 2/22/05 6:48 p.m.
                                                           Re: Suicidal Covenant, like in the Two Towersselmack 2/22/05 7:29 p.m.
                             Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<Paladin-117 2/21/05 6:22 p.m.
                                   Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<58 2/21/05 6:26 p.m.
                                         Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<mrbananas 2/21/05 6:47 p.m.
                                               Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<58 2/21/05 6:59 p.m.
                                                     Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<Stephen (SoundEffect) 2/21/05 7:39 p.m.
                                                           Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<58 2/21/05 7:54 p.m.
                                                                 bwhahahahahahahamrbananas 2/21/05 9:52 p.m.
                                                                       Re: bwhahahahahahahaselmack 2/21/05 10:06 p.m.
                                                                             Re: bwhahahahahahahamrbananas 2/21/05 10:16 p.m.
                                                                                   Re: bwhahahahahahahaselmack 2/21/05 10:39 p.m.
                                                                                         Re: bwhahahahahahahamrbananas 2/22/05 9:18 a.m.
                                                                       my trap seems to have worked perfectly *NM*mrbananas 2/22/05 10:11 p.m.
                                                     Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<mrbananas 2/21/05 10:08 p.m.
                                         Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<selmack 2/21/05 7:49 p.m.
                                               Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<58 2/21/05 7:56 p.m.
                                                     Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<selmack 2/21/05 8:04 p.m.
                                                           Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<58 2/21/05 8:12 p.m.
                                                                 Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<selmack 2/21/05 8:18 p.m.
                                                                       Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<mrbananas 2/21/05 9:57 p.m.
                                                                             Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<selmack 2/21/05 10:08 p.m.
                                                                                   Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<58 2/22/05 7:00 a.m.
                                                                                         Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<selmack 2/22/05 8:49 a.m.
                                                                                         Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<mrbananas 2/22/05 9:01 a.m.
                                                                                               Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<Stephen (SoundEffect) 2/22/05 10:49 a.m.
                                                                                                     Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<58 2/22/05 5:13 p.m.
                                                                                                           Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<mrbananas 2/22/05 10:08 p.m.
                                                                                                                 Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<selmack 2/23/05 8:12 a.m.
                                                                                                                       Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<mrbananas 2/23/05 11:24 a.m.
                                                                                                                             Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<selmack 2/23/05 5:58 p.m.
                                                                                         Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<replay 2/22/05 1:35 p.m.
                                                                                               Re: GAH! We're not Forerunners! >.<mrbananas 2/22/05 1:50 p.m.
                                                                                                     WHOA!New Guy 2/25/05 11:12 p.m.
                                                                                                           Delete this pleaseNew Guy 2/25/05 11:13 p.m.
                                                                                                                 NEvermindNew Guy 2/25/05 11:16 p.m.
                                                                                                                       Re: NEvermindVirus_232 2/25/05 11:20 p.m.
                                                                                                                             Re: NEvermindNew Guy 2/25/05 11:24 p.m.
                                                                                                                                   Re: NEvermindVirus_232 2/25/05 11:33 p.m.
                                                                                                                                   Re: NEvermindHawk7886 2/26/05 6:13 a.m.
     Are there actual dates in 2552 given in ILB?replay 2/22/05 1:01 a.m.
           Re: Are there actual dates in 2552 given in ILB?selmack 2/22/05 6:30 p.m.
     Or something else?Sly_Avatar 2/25/05 6:48 p.m.
           Re: Or something else?Hikaru-119 2/25/05 6:54 p.m.
                 Ark in splinter Cell?!H3WH01SNT 2/25/05 7:32 p.m.
                       Re: Ark in splinter Cell?!Hawaiian Pig 2/25/05 7:39 p.m.
                             Halo came before SC....Virus_232 2/25/05 8:18 p.m.
                                   Re: Halo came before SC....arclight 2/25/05 8:28 p.m.
                                         I am an 800 pound gorilla! *NM*H3WH01SNT 2/25/05 8:32 p.m.
                                               Re: I am an 800 pound gorilla!Zado Zudamee 2/25/05 9:06 p.m.
                                                     Re: I am an 800 pound gorilla!Virus_232 2/25/05 10:55 p.m.
                       Re: Ark in splinter Cell?!Dundre 2/25/05 11:58 p.m.



contact us

The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33.