Frequently Asked Forum Questions | ||||
Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts | ||||
Re: Earth had 300 MAC stations in clusters of 3 | |
Posted By: replay <replay0@hotmail.com> | Date: 2/11/05 10:16 p.m. |
In Response To: Re: Earth had 300 MAC stations in clusters of 3 (mrbananas) : Reach was more important than earth, Reach was the militray planet of the
Huh? Reach is more important than Earth? That must be why Earth had 300 MAC stations versus Reach's 20, right? Why ONI and UNSC evacuated all personnel from Castle Base instead of defending it to the last man? Why there is a Cole Protocol, and not a similar Protocol for Reach? Why everyone in the books worry over Earth's eventually discovery, and not Reach's? That must be why UNSC recalled ships for the Reach battle only from 2-3 local star systems? Why UNSC had ships coming in all day for Earth at the start of Halo 2? The evidence just doesn't add up that Reach is more important than Earth. : Reach had 150 ships. i say earth had less, you know why, if earth had more
That same argument can be used against you. Look how many UNSC ships are visible just outside Cairo's windows. Those are just the ships in a revolution around Earth at that certain time. Think about the rest of the ships spread across the entirety of Earth space beyond what you can see. As for the explosions, look at how many explosions there are, and how there are still visibly dozens upon dozens of UNSC ships still heading into the warzone. This doesn't even consider ships from other sectors above Earth. Reach only had 150 ships because Reach's docks by itself had 100-150 ships in dock at any time. There were not many ships that came from other solar systems to Reach's defense. You can pretty much infer that all remaining UNSC ships after TFOR head to Earth for the final defense. |
|
Replies: |
Halo 2 timeline *IMG* | Count Zero | 2/7/05 10:56 p.m. |
Re: Halo 2 timeline | Hawaiian Pig | 2/7/05 11:01 p.m. |
Re: Halo 2 timeline | gspawn | 2/7/05 11:02 p.m. |
Re: Halo 2 timeline | Wraith7n | 2/7/05 11:06 p.m. |
I Loved the last part of the timeline. LOL *NM* | last recon | 2/8/05 1:00 a.m. |
Re: Wraith7n comment reply | U K Narayan | 2/8/05 1:07 a.m. |
Re: Wraith7n comment reply | Peptuck | 2/8/05 1:46 a.m. |
Re: Wraith7n comment reply | 58 | 2/8/05 6:21 a.m. |
Let's hope not... | Pezcore343 | 2/8/05 4:26 p.m. |
Re: Let's hope not... | 58 | 2/8/05 4:35 p.m. |
Re: Let's hope not... | Pezcore343 | 2/8/05 4:43 p.m. |
Re: Let's hope not... | 58 | 2/8/05 4:53 p.m. |
Re: Let's hope not... | Pezcore343 | 2/8/05 5:03 p.m. |
Earth had 300 MAC stations in clusters of 3 *NM* | replay | 2/8/05 5:08 p.m. |
Ahhh thanks for the clarification | Pezcore343 | 2/8/05 5:09 p.m. |
Re: Ahhh thanks for the clarification | dude1 | 2/8/05 8:14 p.m. |
Re: Earth had 300 MAC stations in clusters of 3 | mrbananas | 2/10/05 5:50 p.m. |
Re: Earth had 300 MAC stations in clusters of 3 | dude1 | 2/10/05 6:06 p.m. |
Re: Earth had 300 MAC stations in clusters of 3 | SumSophisticatedName | 2/10/05 6:28 p.m. |
Re: Earth had 300 MAC stations in clusters of 3 | dude1 | 2/10/05 7:44 p.m. |
Re: Earth had 300 MAC stations in clusters of 3 | SumSophisticatedName | 2/10/05 8:54 p.m. |
Re: Earth had 300 MAC stations in clusters of 3 | mrbananas | 2/10/05 9:23 p.m. |
Re: Earth had 300 MAC stations in clusters of 3 | 58 | 2/10/05 9:26 p.m. |
Re: Earth had 300 MAC stations in clusters of 3 | replay | 2/10/05 10:11 p.m. |
Re: Earth had 300 MAC stations in clusters of 3 | mrbananas | 2/10/05 10:12 p.m. |
Re: Earth had 300 MAC stations in clusters of 3 | 58 | 2/10/05 10:27 p.m. |
Re: Earth had 300 MAC stations in clusters of 3 | mrbananas | 2/10/05 10:40 p.m. |
Re: Earth had 300 MAC stations in clusters of 3 | 58 | 2/11/05 7:17 a.m. |
Re: Earth had 300 MAC stations in clusters of 3 | mrbananas | 2/11/05 9:18 a.m. |
Re: Earth had 300 MAC stations in clusters of 3 | dude1 | 2/11/05 3:44 p.m. |
Re: Earth had 300 MAC stations in clusters of 3 | mrbananas | 2/11/05 9:33 p.m. |
Re: Earth had 300 MAC stations in clusters of 3 | replay | 2/11/05 10:16 p.m. |
Re: Earth had 300 MAC stations in clusters of 3 | Tyraelis | 2/12/05 12:29 a.m. |
Re: Earth had 300 MAC stations in clusters of 3 | replay | 2/10/05 7:33 p.m. |
Re: Earth had 300 MAC stations in clusters of 3 | mrbananas | 2/10/05 8:45 p.m. |
Re: Earth had 300 MAC stations in clusters of 3 | replay | 2/10/05 10:06 p.m. |
Re: Wraith7n comment reply | Vanguard21 | 2/10/05 5:35 p.m. |
Re: Halo 2 timeline | mrbananas | 2/7/05 11:10 p.m. |
Re: Halo 2 timeline | Hawaiian Pig | 2/7/05 11:15 p.m. |
Re: Halo 2 timeline | mrbananas | 2/8/05 8:45 a.m. |
Hey, you know... | Louis Wu | 2/8/05 10:01 a.m. |
Re: Hey, you know... | KP | 2/8/05 10:57 a.m. |
-Blam!-ing hell... | Walshicus | 2/8/05 11:07 a.m. |
Re: -Blam!-ing hell... | KP | 2/8/05 11:24 a.m. |
Re: -Blam!-ing hell... | Walshicus | 2/8/05 11:37 a.m. |
Re: -Blam!-ing hell... | Count Zero | 2/8/05 12:33 p.m. |
Re: -Blam!-ing hell... | Gre'Thor | 2/8/05 4:11 p.m. |
Re: -Blam!-ing hell... | Usul | 2/8/05 6:04 p.m. |
Re: -Blam!-ing hell... | Dundre | 2/8/05 8:04 p.m. |
Re: -Blam!-ing hell... *OT* | Usul | 2/9/05 1:25 a.m. |
Re: -Blam!-ing hell... *OT* | Count Zero | 2/9/05 8:32 a.m. |
Re: -Blam!-ing hell... *OT* | mrbananas | 2/9/05 9:34 a.m. |
Re: -Blam!-ing hell... *OT* | Sep7imus [subnova] | 2/9/05 9:39 a.m. |
Re: -Blam!-ing hell... *OT* | Usul | 2/9/05 7:20 p.m. |
expensive education, yes - but... | Chthonian | 2/8/05 10:24 p.m. |
All my education is free - Scots rule! | Jillybean | 2/8/05 1:39 p.m. |
back up | mrbananas | 2/8/05 2:33 p.m. |
don't worry | Hawaiian Pig | 2/8/05 3:45 p.m. |
Re: All my education is free - Scots rule! | replay | 2/8/05 4:30 p.m. |
Wait a sec... | Pezcore343 | 2/8/05 4:33 p.m. |
Well... | Walshicus | 2/8/05 4:51 p.m. |
Re: All my education is free - Scots rule! *NM* | Pezcore343 | 2/8/05 4:33 p.m. |
Re: All my education is free - Scots rule! | zugy | 2/8/05 5:14 p.m. |
I agree, thanks for bringing it up *NM* | replay | 2/8/05 2:27 p.m. |
Re: Halo 2 timeline | Infininja | 2/8/05 2:10 p.m. |
Re: Halo 2 timeline | mrbananas | 2/8/05 2:40 p.m. |
Re: Halo 2 timeline | Hawk7886 | 2/7/05 11:17 p.m. |
Re: Good Job *NM* *NM* | Ain Soph Aur | 2/8/05 12:03 a.m. |
I like *NM* | replay | 2/8/05 3:20 a.m. |
Re: Halo 2 timeline | Blaz | 2/8/05 6:14 a.m. |
Re: Halo 2 timeline | guiltysparkzz | 2/8/05 6:33 a.m. |
Re: Halo 2 timeline | Peptuck | 2/8/05 9:31 a.m. |
Not necessarily | Pezcore343 | 2/8/05 4:38 p.m. |
Re: Not necessarily | E.I.G. | 2/8/05 4:45 p.m. |
Re: Not necessarily | Peptuck | 2/8/05 8:13 p.m. |
think Smaug | Chthonian | 2/8/05 10:29 p.m. |
Re: think Smaug | Peptuck | 2/8/05 11:52 p.m. |
Re: Halo 2 timeline | M4rk | 2/8/05 7:11 a.m. |
Missing Chapter? | Interactive Civilian | 2/8/05 7:13 a.m. |
hrmm maybe not (Re: Missing Chapter?) | Interactive Civilian | 2/8/05 7:24 a.m. |
Re: Missing Chapter? | Schwaumlaut | 2/8/05 7:26 a.m. |
Re: Missing Chapter? | Ultra Sonic 007 | 2/8/05 8:33 a.m. |
Re: Missing Chapter? | Peptuck | 2/8/05 9:36 a.m. |
Re: Missing Chapter? | Walshicus | 2/8/05 11:56 a.m. |
Re: Missing Chapter? | Interactive Civilian | 2/9/05 7:07 p.m. |
Re: Missing Chapter? | MC vince | 2/11/05 7:13 p.m. |
Re: Missing Chapter? | Jillybean | 2/11/05 7:17 p.m. |
Re: Missing Chapter? | MC vince | 2/11/05 7:25 p.m. |
Re: Missing Chapter? | Jillybean | 2/11/05 7:32 p.m. |
Re: Missing Chapter? | badgerjb | 2/13/05 5:18 p.m. |
Re: Halo 2 timeline *NM* | ManKitten | 2/8/05 11:01 a.m. |
I like it | Jillybean | 2/8/05 1:49 p.m. |
Re: I like it | MC vince | 2/10/05 11:31 a.m. |
Re: I like it | Louis Wu | 2/10/05 12:01 p.m. |
Re: I like it | MC vince | 2/10/05 9:18 p.m. |
Re: Halo 2 timeline | Joshua Rennert | 2/8/05 3:51 p.m. |
Great Work, we appreciate it *NM* | SwiftJustice25 | 2/8/05 4:59 p.m. |
Really, REALLY nice work *NM* | Usul | 2/8/05 6:19 p.m. |
Well put... | Shogo0788 | 2/8/05 10:31 p.m. |
Re: Halo 2 timeline | Pvt. Jenkins | 2/10/05 12:47 a.m. |
Re: Halo 2 timeline -battle at Earth question | Wado SG | 2/12/05 12:36 p.m. |
The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33. |