Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa |
Posted By: Metatron <Eagle-117@cox.net> | Date: 8/20/04 6:35 p.m. |
In Response To: Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa (117-er)
: 343 GS also says, "Why would you hesitate to do something that you have
: already done?" Under your circumstances, this wouldn't make sense.
: The Master Chief Himself never set off Halo, not in his inverted time
: state or elsewhere. Therefore, the Monitor's remarks would have only made
: sense if he thought that the Master Chief was someone who came before and
: had already activated the Halo, probably because of the MC's genetic
: similarities to the one who came before. So that makes all of 343 GS'
: comments connected to the mistaken identity of the Master Chief and so
: they can't be shown to link to the idea that 343 GS is familiar with him
: because of the time traveling.
-Actually, I meant to take that quote out, because if you look at the conversation as a whole, 343 GS can be shown to be saying something entirely different than the activation of Halo.
343 GS - "We have followed outbreak containment procedure to the letter. You were with me each step of the way, as we managed this crisis." "Why would you hesitate to do what you have already done?"
It's quite probable that 343 GS is saying, in layman terms, "you've done everything protocol requires, why would you not continue down this path?"
: However, there is one possibility. The Covenant ship scanning with human
: frequencies? as quoted by Nylund: No, actually it is not[technological
: thievery]. It's something else entirely.
: Maybe this has to do with humans, possibly Dr. Halsey or some other
: time-traveling heroes going back to look for something. Who knows? Anyway,
: please respond and thanks for reading.
Yes, the Covenant cruiser scanning on human frequecies is an interesting topic, and one I originally included in this theory. However, in my attempts to shorten the original theory, I took that part out:)
-Metatron
|
The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summary a | Metatron | 8/19/04 2:34 p.m. |
Longest Post... EVER! *NM* | WildMonkeys | 8/19/04 2:39 p.m. |
Re: Very interesting must read^^^ | Mantis819 | 8/19/04 3:07 p.m. |
Re: The theory is.. | Noctaurus | 8/19/04 3:45 p.m. |
Re: The theory is.. | Metatron | 8/19/04 4:07 p.m. |
Re: Very interesting must read^^^ | Assault on the Bathroom | 8/19/04 3:45 p.m. |
Re: Very interesting must read^^^ | Saint | 8/19/04 3:47 p.m. |
Re: Very interesting must read^^^ | Assault on the Bathroom | 8/19/04 3:48 p.m. |
Excuse me. | Saint | 8/19/04 3:54 p.m. |
Re: Excuse me. | Assault on the Bathroom | 8/19/04 3:57 p.m. |
Look. | Saint | 8/19/04 4:01 p.m. |
Re: Look. | Assault on the Bathroom | 8/19/04 4:05 p.m. |
Re: Look. | Saint | 8/19/04 4:09 p.m. |
Re: Look. | chaotic_mind | 8/19/04 5:07 p.m. |
Re: Very interesting must read^^^ | Metatron | 8/19/04 4:05 p.m. |
Re: Very interesting must read^^^ | Oldbean | 8/19/04 4:35 p.m. |
Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa | Ain Soph Aur | 8/19/04 3:10 p.m. |
Very good theory , A MUST read *NM* *NM* | Invictus | 8/19/04 3:46 p.m. |
Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa | Metatron | 8/19/04 4:03 p.m. |
Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa | E.T. the Extremely Tired | 8/22/04 11:10 a.m. |
Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa | Metatron | 8/22/04 10:14 p.m. |
Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa | yakaman | 8/19/04 5:54 p.m. |
Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa | Metatron | 8/19/04 6:27 p.m. |
Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa | Mantis819 | 8/19/04 3:10 p.m. |
good theory, some holes, however. *NM* | insaneidiot432 | 8/19/04 3:34 p.m. |
Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa | Neo-genesis | 8/19/04 3:51 p.m. |
Explain what the holes in this are:) *NM* | Metatron | 8/19/04 4:17 p.m. |
Just when I thought "I" had it figured out. | Dando7 | 8/19/04 4:58 p.m. |
Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa | yakaman | 8/19/04 5:47 p.m. |
Wonderful theory, worth a read *NM* | Wiggum | 8/19/04 6:23 p.m. |
Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa | JAGUAR2G | 8/25/04 3:35 p.m. |
Awesome, but... | Marcus | 8/19/04 7:12 p.m. |
50 first dates - HSP Rocks! | Wado SG | 8/19/04 8:00 p.m. |
Re: 50 first dates - HSP Rocks! | mnemesis | 8/19/04 8:54 p.m. |
Re: 50 first dates - HSP Rocks! | Metatron | 8/19/04 11:21 p.m. |
Re: 50 first dates - HSP Rocks! | mnemesis | 8/19/04 11:42 p.m. |
Re: 50 first dates - HSP Rocks! | Metatron | 8/20/04 12:44 a.m. |
Re: 50 first dates - HSP Rocks! | Wado SG | 8/20/04 12:58 a.m. |
Re: 50 first dates - HSP Rocks! | Metatron | 8/20/04 12:56 a.m. |
Re: Riders in the Storm - HSP Rocks! | Wado SG | 8/20/04 1:10 a.m. |
Re: Riders in the Storm - HSP Rocks! | Metatron | 8/20/04 1:21 a.m. |
Re: Touched by an Angel - HSP Rocks! | Wado SG | 8/20/04 12:25 p.m. |
Re: Touched by an Angel - HSP Rocks! | Metatron | 8/20/04 1:32 p.m. |
Re: Touched by an Angel - HSP Rocks! | Wado SG | 8/20/04 5:08 p.m. |
Re: Touched by an Angel - HSP Rocks! | 117-er | 8/20/04 1:34 p.m. |
Re: Touched by an Angel - HSP Rocks! | Metatron | 8/20/04 1:55 p.m. |
Your 'slip' is showing | PsycoJoe | 8/22/04 1:24 a.m. |
Re: 50 first dates - HSP Rocks! | Jagged | 8/20/04 11:45 p.m. |
Well thought out and executed - Awesome stuff! | Obakemono | 8/19/04 8:11 p.m. |
small possible problem with your theory | Tar | 8/19/04 8:52 p.m. |
Re: small possible problem with your theory | mnemesis | 8/19/04 9:02 p.m. |
However... | Saint | 8/19/04 9:55 p.m. |
Re: However... | Metatron | 8/19/04 11:07 p.m. |
Re: However... | Saint | 8/20/04 7:33 a.m. |
Re: However... | Metatron | 8/20/04 1:18 p.m. |
Re: However... | Saint | 8/20/04 11:10 p.m. |
Re: However... | Metatron | 8/21/04 12:00 a.m. |
Re: small possible problem with your theory | Metatron | 8/19/04 11:04 p.m. |
Re: small possible problem with your theory | Metatron | 8/19/04 11:12 p.m. |
Re: small possible problem with your theory | xal | 8/20/04 4:36 p.m. |
Re: small possible problem with your theory | Metatron | 8/20/04 5:12 p.m. |
Problem with spartan deaths...... | alstrong | 8/20/04 8:20 a.m. |
Re: Problem with spartan deaths...... | Metatron | 8/20/04 1:13 p.m. |
Re: Problem with spartan deaths...... | alstrong | 8/20/04 3:30 p.m. |
Re: Problem with spartan deaths...... | Metatron | 8/20/04 3:35 p.m. |
Re: Problem with spartan deaths...... | alstrong | 8/20/04 3:59 p.m. |
Re: Problem with spartan deaths...... | Energizer | 8/20/04 4:31 p.m. |
Re: Problem with spartan deaths...... | Metatron | 8/20/04 5:10 p.m. |
Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa | Michael M. | 8/20/04 3:25 p.m. |
Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa *NM* | King_Slug | 8/20/04 4:19 p.m. |
Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa | King_Slug | 8/20/04 4:43 p.m. |
Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa | Metatron | 8/20/04 5:21 p.m. |
Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa | MC vince | 8/21/04 2:28 p.m. |
Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa | E.T. the Extremely Tired | 8/22/04 4:38 p.m. |
Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa | Viscily II | 8/24/04 5:33 a.m. |
Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa | Viscily II | 8/24/04 5:45 a.m. |
Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa | Jagged | 8/20/04 4:37 p.m. |
Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa | Metatron | 8/20/04 5:24 p.m. |
Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa | Jagged | 8/20/04 10:03 p.m. |
Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa | Metatron | 8/21/04 12:06 a.m. |
Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa | Jagged | 8/21/04 2:57 p.m. |
Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa | Metatron | 8/21/04 4:28 p.m. |
Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa | Jamirus99 | 8/20/04 5:48 p.m. |
Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa | 117-er | 8/20/04 6:27 p.m. |
Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa | Metatron | 8/20/04 6:35 p.m. |
Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa | 117-er | 8/20/04 6:40 p.m. |
Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa | RedFox34 | 8/20/04 7:42 p.m. |
Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa | 117-er | 8/20/04 10:08 p.m. |
Re: A small detail, perhaps of interest. | ajenteks | 8/20/04 6:35 p.m. |
Re: A small detail, perhaps of interest. | Jagged | 8/20/04 11:11 p.m. |
Re: A small detail, perhaps of interest. | Carver | 9/3/04 9:23 p.m. |
OMG u released Halo Too's Stori!!11!!!one!1 *NM* | r3c0nxiii | 8/20/04 7:40 p.m. |
Awesome. | Exogenesis | 8/20/04 8:14 p.m. |
Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa | tsuranuku | 8/20/04 8:27 p.m. |
Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa | 343winks | 8/20/04 8:44 p.m. |
Does this mean Keyes might return, :D? *NM* | serpx | 8/20/04 8:53 p.m. |
Re: Does this mean Keyes might return, :D? | 343winks | 8/20/04 9:41 p.m. |
Slight Problem....I think..... | Sean-118 | 8/20/04 9:47 p.m. |
Re: Slight Problem....I think..... | Metatron | 8/20/04 9:57 p.m. |
Re: Slight Problem....I think..... | Sean-118 | 8/20/04 10:02 p.m. |
Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa | Broodwich | 8/20/04 11:35 p.m. |
Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa | Metatron | 8/20/04 11:59 p.m. |
Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa | Aginor | 8/21/04 1:24 a.m. |
Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa | Hk_Symbiont | 8/21/04 1:40 a.m. |
Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa | Metatron | 8/21/04 4:41 a.m. |
Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa | Aginor | 8/21/04 6:17 a.m. |
Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa | Metatron | 8/21/04 4:49 p.m. |
Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa | Hk_Symbiont | 8/21/04 2:31 a.m. |
Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa | Aginor | 8/21/04 3:20 a.m. |
Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa | Aginor | 8/21/04 3:23 a.m. |
My...three bits? | YamiyoNaito | 8/21/04 4:13 a.m. |
Ouch, sorry for the eyesore *NM* *NM* | YamiyoNaito | 8/21/04 4:16 a.m. |
Re: My...three bits? | Metatron | 8/21/04 4:51 a.m. |
Re: My...three bits? | Metatron | 8/21/04 5:03 a.m. |
Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa | Metatron | 8/21/04 4:49 a.m. |
Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa | Metatron | 8/21/04 4:45 a.m. |
Do you understand THIS concept? | Metatron | 8/21/04 4:33 a.m. |
interesting, but half-unintelligible....... | theda | 8/21/04 2:59 p.m. |
Re: interesting, but half-unintelligible....... | Metatron | 8/21/04 4:07 p.m. |
Re: interesting, but half-unintelligible....... | Hk_Symbiont | 8/21/04 5:16 p.m. |
Re: interesting, but half-unintelligible....... | Metatron | 8/21/04 5:21 p.m. |
Re: interesting, but half-unintelligible....... | Jagged | 8/23/04 6:31 p.m. |
Re: interesting, but half-unintelligible....... | Metatron | 8/23/04 6:35 p.m. |
Re: interesting, but half-unintelligible....... | Jagged | 8/24/04 5:15 p.m. |
Re: interesting, but half-unintelligible....... | Louis Wu | 8/21/04 6:27 p.m. |
Re: interesting, but half-unintelligible....... | Metatron | 8/21/04 9:01 p.m. |
Re: Do you understand THIS concept? | 343winks | 8/21/04 6:32 p.m. |
Re: Do you understand THIS concept? | DarkScorpio | 8/22/04 2:11 a.m. |
Re: Do you understand THIS concept? | Metatron | 8/22/04 2:32 a.m. |
Re: Do you understand THIS concept? | Metatron | 8/22/04 2:46 a.m. |
Like this? | Nickk | 8/22/04 7:36 a.m. |
Re: Like this? | DarkScorpio | 8/22/04 12:29 p.m. |
Re: Like this? | DarkScorpio | 8/22/04 1:35 p.m. |
Re: Like this? | Nickk | 8/23/04 2:56 a.m. |
Re: Do you understand THIS concept? | 343winks | 8/22/04 2:59 a.m. |
Re: Do you understand THIS concept? | Dando7 | 8/22/04 1:39 p.m. |
Re: Do you understand THIS concept? | Energizer | 8/22/04 4:40 p.m. |
Howz a Bowz Dis? | Dando7 | 8/22/04 12:33 p.m. |
Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa | Joshua Pettigrew | 8/22/04 9:27 p.m. |
Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa | DarkScorpio | 8/22/04 10:05 p.m. |
Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa | 117-er | 8/23/04 1:16 a.m. |
Coincidence, or Deja Vu? | Metatron | 8/23/04 4:59 p.m. |
Re: Coincidence, or Deja Vu? | 117-er | 8/25/04 6:17 p.m. |
Very Cool. but I disagree with the time loop part | pile o' nades | 8/25/04 10:19 a.m. |
two betrayals | georgeharthalo | 8/25/04 2:19 p.m. |
Re: two betrayals, is it? | vshields ash | 8/25/04 3:42 p.m. |
well u know | georgeharthalo | 8/26/04 11:31 a.m. |
Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa | David Vacher | 9/3/04 9:28 a.m. |
I am looking forward to... | theda | 9/3/04 10:23 a.m. |
Re: I am looking forward to... | Pak | 9/3/04 10:40 a.m. |
Re: I am looking forward to... | MikeMan445 | 9/3/04 12:04 p.m. |
Re: I am looking forward to... | cam | 9/3/04 11:58 p.m. |
Re: I am looking forward to... | Metatron | 9/4/04 12:15 a.m. |
Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa | Metatron | 9/3/04 4:48 p.m. |
Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa | Ghentec | 9/6/04 8:30 p.m. |
Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa | Havoc | 9/14/04 12:28 a.m. |
Re: The Theory that Starts a NEW Discussion (Summa | x1zero | 9/14/04 1:28 a.m. |