Frequently Asked Forum Questions | ||||
Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts | ||||
Re: Halo50K2 Write-Up ***MANY PICS *** | |
Posted By: Elan Sleazbagano | Date: 8/7/03 6:22 p.m. |
In Response To: Re: Halo50K2 Write-Up ***MANY PICS *** (Miguel Chavez) : I saw DMan's rant on the 50k2 board. I can understand his frustration. (I
: In my mind, no one has really made the ultimate Halo tournament, but that of
: - M I saw his post as well(after he had posted it), and he didn't fully explain what he meant as best as he could of. I was going to help him write a better response, but I figured its not even worth it with the kind of people over there. It was going to include this at some point:
But it's not as simple as that of course, as 10 second respawn is also a problem as it gives too much power to kills, and therefore takes away from the strategy involved. Why have to defend the hill from a constant onslaught when I can just blow the guy away and he'll be gone for 10 seconds. Use strategy to get away with the flag? Why? I can just send one guy in their with a rocket launcher and be in the clear. Etc, etc. Of course, I understand it's their tournament and they can do whatever the hell they want, I'm just saying. I'd rather not go into it fully, but I'll add a little more. I think DmAn was frustrated by the fact that we went to a tournament (to compete, but not win), and did extremely well in our pool play (BA CTF, which has no pistols anywhere), against OpN (amongst others), who happened to have the same pool play selection as us (they had Nav Points on and the flag didn't have to be home to score -only differences). We beat them easily (3-0, 3-1 [they scored with the extremely cheap rocket the flag across the level move]), yet they killed us on BC TS [50-19](it was part of a 3 way tie breaker for 1st in the pool play round). OpN placed 3rd overall. 3rd?!!?!?!!? I think that was a big part of his frustration -add in the fact that OpN are a bunch of assholes [see their posts for some proof], and you've got a mix for a rant that should have been explained a little better. Ok... that went on for longer then I intended. :) ES<--- |
|
Replies: |
The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33. |