glyphstrip FAQ button
Halo.bungie.org
glyphstrip
Frequently Asked Forum Questions
 Search the HBO News Archives

Any All Exact 
Search the Halo Updates DBs

Halo Halo2 
Search Older Posts on This Forum:
Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts


eww..starcraft..(totally OT)
Posted By: skyblu38 <skyblu38@mac.com>Date: 3/25/00 4:44 p.m.

In Response To: Re: nope, not a fake (Xero)

> "We operate outside of Confederate law. That is why they
> spread their lies and misinformation..."

That's from Starcraft. An entertaining game no doubt, but hardly technologically advanced and the missions are so similar to one another that they can hardly be identified. The story has great promise, but never reaches the full extent it could, not even in Brood War. Also, some very obnoxious things arise when controlling your units. The most impressive thing would be the GREAT cutscenes. Why couldn't the game be at least an eighth as graphically advanced as those cutscenes?? Why does the physics engine barely exist? Why can new units and total conversions not be accomplished without some heavy hax0ring??Why is the map editor so easy to use that nauseatingly bad maps are created and then ACTUALLY USED FREQUENTLY. I doubt I will ever see the same person twice on battle.net also. Blizzard sends nauseating shivers down my spine. On the back of the starcraft manual I have :

In 1998, Look for : *=some random warcraft thingy=*

Diablo II...

the innacuracy!!!!

--sky


Message Index




Replies:

Could it be a fake???RCox 3/21/00 9:33 p.m.
     Re: Could it be a fake???mud 3/21/00 11:00 p.m.
           Re: Could it be a fake???Mhaddy 3/21/00 11:06 p.m.
                 nope, not a fakeTsao =PN= 3/22/00 1:13 a.m.
                       Re: nope, not a fakemud 3/22/00 1:53 a.m.
                             Re: nope, not a fakeMark Levin 3/22/00 8:11 a.m.
                                   Re: nope, not a fakeRCox 3/22/00 10:39 a.m.
                                         link works, extra ">" -NT-wc 3/22/00 11:55 a.m.
                                         Re: nope, not a fakemud 3/22/00 1:19 p.m.
                                               Re: nope, not a fakeShadowfax 3/22/00 8:04 p.m.
                                                     Re: nope, not a fakemud 3/22/00 10:16 p.m.
                                                           Re: nope, not a fakeMatt 3/23/00 10:31 a.m.
                                                                 Re: nope, not a fakemenace 3/23/00 11:36 a.m.
                                                                       Re: nope, not a fakeCorum Jhaelen Irsei 3/23/00 12:06 p.m.
                                                                 Re: nope, not a fakeRCox 3/23/00 4:09 p.m.
                                                                 Re: nope, not a fakemud 3/23/00 11:20 p.m.
                                                                       Re: nope, not a fakeDoug 3/24/00 4:59 p.m.
                                                                             Re: nope, not a fakeXero 3/25/00 12:54 p.m.
                                                                                   eww..starcraft..(totally OT)skyblu38 3/25/00 4:44 p.m.
                                                                                         Re: starcraft had a physics engine? -nt-RCox 3/25/00 6:16 p.m.
                                                     Re: nope, not a fakeDave Fin' 3/23/00 3:02 a.m.
                                                           Re: nope, not a fakeJh'Akin 3/24/00 12:15 a.m.
                                                                 Re: nope, not a fakeSiliconDream =PN= 3/24/00 2:12 a.m.
                                                                 Re: nope, not a fakemud 3/24/00 8:04 p.m.
                                                     Re: nope, not a fakeDan Rudolph 3/23/00 10:46 p.m.



contact us

The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33.