> I just had a thought (quiet, you) and it went like this:
> Seeing as this seems to be (SEEMS TO BE emphasis on) purely numerical at
> this step, I'm worried about something. Claude seems to be telling us to
> look for self-contained solutions- I take this to mean that each glyph has
> a separate answer (I mean, different way of getting the answer), and that
> a single method will not solve for all of them. But...
> Look at all of the patterns we're getting!
> Quite literally, I could pick through the posts and find 7 random ones,
> apply them to arbitrarily-chosen glyphs, and get answers for them. And
> who's to say that it would be wrong? I could then change which formula I
> used for which glyph and try again. I could keep doing that until I
> exhausted them- and then just go get 7 fresh glyphs.
> So, my question- and my worry- is this: Assuming that, indeed, each glyph
> needs to be solved seperately- Will Chelsea come forth and tell us when we
> have the right method for a glyph?

> On second thought, the more I think about this, the less likely it seems
> that the puzzle would be solved this way. But that's sure what it sounded
> like Claude was saying.