> What if one were to take numbers from across the Glyphs, instead?
> For instance, one could make a group of all the numbers on top: 37, 3, 33,
> 50, 15, 10, 24.

I took a look at this, and with looking at what chelsea said "Is there something missing? Something not? Something else?" I did a little which one of these is not like the other...

37, 3, 33, 50, 15, 10, 24
- 24 is the only one that doesn't seem to fit...
- 37, 3 & 33 all have a 3 in them.
- 50, 15, & 10 are all divisible by 5 & have digits the same (5, 1, & 0)...
- 24 doesn't fit at all.

However, the idea of taking numbers from seperate glyphs seems to contradict Claude's hint, "Might be time to start looking for self-contained patterns..".
I've been looking for self-contained patterns in glyph 1... can't see anything yet.